Cargando…

Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the standard treatments of choice for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Herein, we aimed to analyze MM patients at our center and compare the clinical outcomes of single and double ASCT patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malkan, Umit Yavuz, Demiroglu, Haluk, Buyukasik, Yahya, Karatas, Ayse, Aladag, Elifcan, Goker, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0216
_version_ 1783647413512175616
author Malkan, Umit Yavuz
Demiroglu, Haluk
Buyukasik, Yahya
Karatas, Ayse
Aladag, Elifcan
Goker, Hakan
author_facet Malkan, Umit Yavuz
Demiroglu, Haluk
Buyukasik, Yahya
Karatas, Ayse
Aladag, Elifcan
Goker, Hakan
author_sort Malkan, Umit Yavuz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the standard treatments of choice for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Herein, we aimed to analyze MM patients at our center and compare the clinical outcomes of single and double ASCT patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having MM and had undergone single or double ASCT in our clinic between the years 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: In this study, the median time of second ASCT is approximately 3.6 years from the first ASCT. Overall survival (OS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 4,011 ± 266 vs 3,526 ± 326 days, respectively (p: 0.33). Progression-free survival (PFS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 2,344 ± 228 vs 685 ± 120 days, respectively (p: 0.22). Disease assessment after ASCT stable or progressive disease, partial remission, and very good partial or complete remission (CR) in single and double ASCT groups was 62/44/105 and 8/4/5, respectively (p: 0.22). CONCLUSION: The present study points out that the second ASCT treatment option for MM patients may not be effective as suggested, especially in the era of novel MM drugs, since our results come from the past data that novel drugs were not exist. In conclusion, we found no benefit with second ASCT in MM patients in terms of PFS and OS or CR rates, and the novel anti-myeloma drugs might decrease the need for a second transplant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78629952021-02-12 Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients Malkan, Umit Yavuz Demiroglu, Haluk Buyukasik, Yahya Karatas, Ayse Aladag, Elifcan Goker, Hakan Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the standard treatments of choice for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Herein, we aimed to analyze MM patients at our center and compare the clinical outcomes of single and double ASCT patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having MM and had undergone single or double ASCT in our clinic between the years 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: In this study, the median time of second ASCT is approximately 3.6 years from the first ASCT. Overall survival (OS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 4,011 ± 266 vs 3,526 ± 326 days, respectively (p: 0.33). Progression-free survival (PFS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 2,344 ± 228 vs 685 ± 120 days, respectively (p: 0.22). Disease assessment after ASCT stable or progressive disease, partial remission, and very good partial or complete remission (CR) in single and double ASCT groups was 62/44/105 and 8/4/5, respectively (p: 0.22). CONCLUSION: The present study points out that the second ASCT treatment option for MM patients may not be effective as suggested, especially in the era of novel MM drugs, since our results come from the past data that novel drugs were not exist. In conclusion, we found no benefit with second ASCT in MM patients in terms of PFS and OS or CR rates, and the novel anti-myeloma drugs might decrease the need for a second transplant. De Gruyter 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7862995/ /pubmed/33585695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0216 Text en © 2021 Umit Yavuz Malkan et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malkan, Umit Yavuz
Demiroglu, Haluk
Buyukasik, Yahya
Karatas, Ayse
Aladag, Elifcan
Goker, Hakan
Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title_full Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title_fullStr Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title_short Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
title_sort comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0216
work_keys_str_mv AT malkanumityavuz comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients
AT demirogluhaluk comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients
AT buyukasikyahya comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients
AT karatasayse comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients
AT aladagelifcan comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients
AT gokerhakan comparisonofsingleanddoubleautologousstemcelltransplantationinmultiplemyelomapatients