Cargando…

The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery

BACKGROUND: The impact of smoking on spinal surgery has been studied extensively, but few investigations have focused on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine and the difference between complication rates in smokers and non-smokers. We evaluated whether a history of at least one pack-year pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senker, Wolfgang, Stefanits, Harald, Gmeiner, Matthias, Trutschnig, Wolfgang, Radl, Christian, Gruber, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0223
_version_ 1783647415401709568
author Senker, Wolfgang
Stefanits, Harald
Gmeiner, Matthias
Trutschnig, Wolfgang
Radl, Christian
Gruber, Andreas
author_facet Senker, Wolfgang
Stefanits, Harald
Gmeiner, Matthias
Trutschnig, Wolfgang
Radl, Christian
Gruber, Andreas
author_sort Senker, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of smoking on spinal surgery has been studied extensively, but few investigations have focused on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine and the difference between complication rates in smokers and non-smokers. We evaluated whether a history of at least one pack-year preoperatively could be used to predict adverse peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive fusion procedures of the lumbar spine. In a prospective study, we assessed the clinical effectiveness of MIS in an unselected population of 187 patients. METHODS: We evaluated perioperative and postoperative complication rates in MIS fusion techniques of the lumbar spine in smoking and non-smoking patients. MIS fusion was performed using interbody fusion procedures and/or posterolateral fusion alone. RESULTS: Smokers were significantly younger than non-smokers. We did not encounter infection at the site of surgery or severe wound healing disorder in smokers. We registered no difference between the smoking and non-smoking groups with regard to peri- or postoperative complication rate, blood loss, or length of stay in hospital. We found a significant influence of smoking (p = 0.049) on the overall perioperative complication rate. CONCLUSION: MIS fusion techniques seem to be a suitable tool for treating degenerative spinal disorders in smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78630032021-02-12 The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery Senker, Wolfgang Stefanits, Harald Gmeiner, Matthias Trutschnig, Wolfgang Radl, Christian Gruber, Andreas Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of smoking on spinal surgery has been studied extensively, but few investigations have focused on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine and the difference between complication rates in smokers and non-smokers. We evaluated whether a history of at least one pack-year preoperatively could be used to predict adverse peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive fusion procedures of the lumbar spine. In a prospective study, we assessed the clinical effectiveness of MIS in an unselected population of 187 patients. METHODS: We evaluated perioperative and postoperative complication rates in MIS fusion techniques of the lumbar spine in smoking and non-smoking patients. MIS fusion was performed using interbody fusion procedures and/or posterolateral fusion alone. RESULTS: Smokers were significantly younger than non-smokers. We did not encounter infection at the site of surgery or severe wound healing disorder in smokers. We registered no difference between the smoking and non-smoking groups with regard to peri- or postoperative complication rate, blood loss, or length of stay in hospital. We found a significant influence of smoking (p = 0.049) on the overall perioperative complication rate. CONCLUSION: MIS fusion techniques seem to be a suitable tool for treating degenerative spinal disorders in smokers. De Gruyter 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7863003/ /pubmed/33585696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0223 Text en © 2021 Wolfgang Senker et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Senker, Wolfgang
Stefanits, Harald
Gmeiner, Matthias
Trutschnig, Wolfgang
Radl, Christian
Gruber, Andreas
The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title_full The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title_fullStr The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title_full_unstemmed The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title_short The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
title_sort influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0223
work_keys_str_mv AT senkerwolfgang theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT stefanitsharald theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT gmeinermatthias theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT trutschnigwolfgang theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT radlchristian theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT gruberandreas theinfluenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT senkerwolfgang influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT stefanitsharald influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT gmeinermatthias influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT trutschnigwolfgang influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT radlchristian influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery
AT gruberandreas influenceofsmokinginminimallyinvasivespinalfusionsurgery