Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges, Genro, Vanessa Krebs, de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos, Cunha-Filho, João Sabino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33118716
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064
_version_ 1783647433915367424
author Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Genro, Vanessa Krebs
de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos
Cunha-Filho, João Sabino
author_facet Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Genro, Vanessa Krebs
de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos
Cunha-Filho, João Sabino
author_sort Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). RESULTS: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78630902021-02-10 Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges Genro, Vanessa Krebs de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos Cunha-Filho, João Sabino JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). RESULTS: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7863090/ /pubmed/33118716 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Genro, Vanessa Krebs
de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos
Cunha-Filho, João Sabino
Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_full Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_short Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rfsh versus hmg in the ivf protocol with gnrh antagonist
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33118716
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064
work_keys_str_mv AT chaponritadecassiaborges randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist
AT genrovanessakrebs randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist
AT desouzacarlosaugustobastos randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist
AT cunhafilhojoaosabino randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist