Cargando…
Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomiz...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33118716 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064 |
_version_ | 1783647433915367424 |
---|---|
author | Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges Genro, Vanessa Krebs de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos Cunha-Filho, João Sabino |
author_facet | Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges Genro, Vanessa Krebs de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos Cunha-Filho, João Sabino |
author_sort | Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). RESULTS: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7863090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78630902021-02-10 Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges Genro, Vanessa Krebs de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos Cunha-Filho, João Sabino JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). RESULTS: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7863090/ /pubmed/33118716 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges Genro, Vanessa Krebs de Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos Cunha-Filho, João Sabino Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title | Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title_full | Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title_fullStr | Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title_short | Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rfsh versus hmg in the ivf protocol with gnrh antagonist |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33118716 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaponritadecassiaborges randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist AT genrovanessakrebs randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist AT desouzacarlosaugustobastos randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist AT cunhafilhojoaosabino randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingembryonicqualityinrfshversushmgintheivfprotocolwithgnrhantagonist |