Cargando…

Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage

OBJECTIVE: Monozygotic twinning incidence following preimplantation genetic testing in embryos at cleavage-stage does not appear to increase; however, data regarding the possible impact of the blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing is lacking. We compared the incidence of monozygotic twinn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sellers, Rafael, Castillo, Juan Carlos, Ten, Jorge, Rodríguez, Adoración, Ortiz, José A., Sellers, Francisco, Llácer, Joaquín, Bernabeu, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969212
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200069
_version_ 1783647435343527936
author Sellers, Rafael
Castillo, Juan Carlos
Ten, Jorge
Rodríguez, Adoración
Ortiz, José A.
Sellers, Francisco
Llácer, Joaquín
Bernabeu, Rafael
author_facet Sellers, Rafael
Castillo, Juan Carlos
Ten, Jorge
Rodríguez, Adoración
Ortiz, José A.
Sellers, Francisco
Llácer, Joaquín
Bernabeu, Rafael
author_sort Sellers, Rafael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Monozygotic twinning incidence following preimplantation genetic testing in embryos at cleavage-stage does not appear to increase; however, data regarding the possible impact of the blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing is lacking. We compared the incidence of monozygotic twinning in preimplantation genetic testing cycles performed at the blastocyst-stage, versus cycles without PGT, following single embryo transfer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the incidence of twin pregnancies in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and blastocyst-preimplantation genetic testing (253 cycles), versus a period-matched control population of patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and single embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing (606 cycles). RESULTS: The overall monozygotic twinning rate was 14/859 (1.6%) per clinical pregnancy. The incidence of zygotic splitting following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing was 3.5% (95% Confidence interval 1.8%-6.6%) versus 0.8% (95% Confidence interval 0.3%-1.9%) following intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation sperm injection. After adjusting for potential confounders, preimplantation genetic testing cycles were associated with an increase in the incidence of monozygotic twinning when compared to cycles without embryo biopsy (Odd ratio 3.44, 95% Confidence interval 1.05-11.27, p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing performed at the blastocyst stage is associated to an increase in the incidence of monozygotic twinning. Further validation in larger sample size studies is warranted. Patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing must receive proper counselling about the potential risks of the technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78630962021-02-10 Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage Sellers, Rafael Castillo, Juan Carlos Ten, Jorge Rodríguez, Adoración Ortiz, José A. Sellers, Francisco Llácer, Joaquín Bernabeu, Rafael JBRA Assist Reprod Original Paper OBJECTIVE: Monozygotic twinning incidence following preimplantation genetic testing in embryos at cleavage-stage does not appear to increase; however, data regarding the possible impact of the blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing is lacking. We compared the incidence of monozygotic twinning in preimplantation genetic testing cycles performed at the blastocyst-stage, versus cycles without PGT, following single embryo transfer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the incidence of twin pregnancies in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and blastocyst-preimplantation genetic testing (253 cycles), versus a period-matched control population of patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and single embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing (606 cycles). RESULTS: The overall monozygotic twinning rate was 14/859 (1.6%) per clinical pregnancy. The incidence of zygotic splitting following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing was 3.5% (95% Confidence interval 1.8%-6.6%) versus 0.8% (95% Confidence interval 0.3%-1.9%) following intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation sperm injection. After adjusting for potential confounders, preimplantation genetic testing cycles were associated with an increase in the incidence of monozygotic twinning when compared to cycles without embryo biopsy (Odd ratio 3.44, 95% Confidence interval 1.05-11.27, p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing performed at the blastocyst stage is associated to an increase in the incidence of monozygotic twinning. Further validation in larger sample size studies is warranted. Patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing must receive proper counselling about the potential risks of the technique. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7863096/ /pubmed/32969212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200069 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sellers, Rafael
Castillo, Juan Carlos
Ten, Jorge
Rodríguez, Adoración
Ortiz, José A.
Sellers, Francisco
Llácer, Joaquín
Bernabeu, Rafael
Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title_full Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title_fullStr Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title_full_unstemmed Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title_short Monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
title_sort monozygotic twinning following embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969212
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200069
work_keys_str_mv AT sellersrafael monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT castillojuancarlos monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT tenjorge monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT rodriguezadoracion monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT ortizjosea monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT sellersfrancisco monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT llacerjoaquin monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage
AT bernabeurafael monozygotictwinningfollowingembryobiopsyattheblastocyststage