Cargando…

Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs

INTRODUCTION: Rolling resistance (RR) is a drag force acting on manual wheelchairs that is associated with increased propulsion force and is linked to secondary disabling conditions of the upper limbs. A scoping review was conducted to understand how RR of manual wheelchairs has been measured and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ott, Joseph, Pearlman, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320980300
_version_ 1783647444840480768
author Ott, Joseph
Pearlman, Jonathan
author_facet Ott, Joseph
Pearlman, Jonathan
author_sort Ott, Joseph
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rolling resistance (RR) is a drag force acting on manual wheelchairs that is associated with increased propulsion force and is linked to secondary disabling conditions of the upper limbs. A scoping review was conducted to understand how RR of manual wheelchairs has been measured and to identify limitations of those test methods and the factors tested. METHODS: A total of 42 papers were identified and reviewed, and test methods were categorized based on the measurement style of RR, testing level, and if multiple parameters could be tested. Additionally, 34 articles were reviewed for what factors were tested. RESULTS: Seven different testing methods categories were identified: drag test, treadmill, motor draw, deceleration, physiological expenditure, ergometer/dynamometer, and robotic test rig. Relevant articles were categorized into testing factor categories: camber, toe, tire type, tire pressure, caster type, mass, mass distribution, and type of surface. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of testing methods suggests the need for a standardized method that can be used for wheelchair wheel design and selection to reduce RR. It is important to use adjustments, such as a forward rear axle position to mitigate RR as well as using high-pressure pneumatic tires that are properly inflated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78631462021-02-16 Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs Ott, Joseph Pearlman, Jonathan J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article INTRODUCTION: Rolling resistance (RR) is a drag force acting on manual wheelchairs that is associated with increased propulsion force and is linked to secondary disabling conditions of the upper limbs. A scoping review was conducted to understand how RR of manual wheelchairs has been measured and to identify limitations of those test methods and the factors tested. METHODS: A total of 42 papers were identified and reviewed, and test methods were categorized based on the measurement style of RR, testing level, and if multiple parameters could be tested. Additionally, 34 articles were reviewed for what factors were tested. RESULTS: Seven different testing methods categories were identified: drag test, treadmill, motor draw, deceleration, physiological expenditure, ergometer/dynamometer, and robotic test rig. Relevant articles were categorized into testing factor categories: camber, toe, tire type, tire pressure, caster type, mass, mass distribution, and type of surface. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of testing methods suggests the need for a standardized method that can be used for wheelchair wheel design and selection to reduce RR. It is important to use adjustments, such as a forward rear axle position to mitigate RR as well as using high-pressure pneumatic tires that are properly inflated. SAGE Publications 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7863146/ /pubmed/33598312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320980300 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ott, Joseph
Pearlman, Jonathan
Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title_full Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title_fullStr Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title_short Scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
title_sort scoping review of the rolling resistance testing methods and factors that impact manual wheelchairs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320980300
work_keys_str_mv AT ottjoseph scopingreviewoftherollingresistancetestingmethodsandfactorsthatimpactmanualwheelchairs
AT pearlmanjonathan scopingreviewoftherollingresistancetestingmethodsandfactorsthatimpactmanualwheelchairs