Cargando…

Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe

Background. Validated microsimulation models have been shown to be useful tools in providing support for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decisions. Aiming to assist European countries in reducing CRC mortality, we developed and validated three regional models for evaluating CRC screening in Europe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gini, Andrea, Buskermolen, Maaike, Senore, Carlo, Anttila, Ahti, Novak Mlakar, Dominika, Veerus, Piret, Csanádi, Marcell, Jansen, Erik E. L., Zielonke, Nadine, Heinävaara, Sirpa, Széles, György, Segnan, Nereo, de Koning, Harry J., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468320984974
_version_ 1783647451015544832
author Gini, Andrea
Buskermolen, Maaike
Senore, Carlo
Anttila, Ahti
Novak Mlakar, Dominika
Veerus, Piret
Csanádi, Marcell
Jansen, Erik E. L.
Zielonke, Nadine
Heinävaara, Sirpa
Széles, György
Segnan, Nereo
de Koning, Harry J.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_facet Gini, Andrea
Buskermolen, Maaike
Senore, Carlo
Anttila, Ahti
Novak Mlakar, Dominika
Veerus, Piret
Csanádi, Marcell
Jansen, Erik E. L.
Zielonke, Nadine
Heinävaara, Sirpa
Széles, György
Segnan, Nereo
de Koning, Harry J.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_sort Gini, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Background. Validated microsimulation models have been shown to be useful tools in providing support for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decisions. Aiming to assist European countries in reducing CRC mortality, we developed and validated three regional models for evaluating CRC screening in Europe. Methods. Microsimulation Screening Analysis–Colon (MISCAN-Colon) model versions for Italy, Slovenia, and Finland were quantified using data from different national institutions. These models were validated against the best available evidence for the effectiveness of screening from their region (when available): the Screening for COlon REctum (SCORE) trial and the Florentine fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening study for Italy; the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial and the guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) Finnish population-based study for Finland. When published evidence was not available (Slovenia), the model was validated using cancer registry data. Results. Our three models reproduced age-specific CRC incidence rates and stage distributions in the prescreening period. Moreover, the Italian and Finnish models replicated CRC mortality reductions (reasonably) well against the best available evidence. CRC mortality reductions were predicted slightly larger than those observed (except for the Florentine FIT study), but consistently within the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Conclusions. Our findings corroborate the MISCAN-Colon reliability in supporting decision making on CRC screening. Furthermore, our study provides the model structure for an additional tool (EU-TOPIA CRC evaluation tool: http://miscan.eu-topia.org) that aims to help policymakers and researchers monitoring or improving CRC screening in Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78631722021-02-16 Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe Gini, Andrea Buskermolen, Maaike Senore, Carlo Anttila, Ahti Novak Mlakar, Dominika Veerus, Piret Csanádi, Marcell Jansen, Erik E. L. Zielonke, Nadine Heinävaara, Sirpa Széles, György Segnan, Nereo de Koning, Harry J. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris MDM Policy Pract Article Background. Validated microsimulation models have been shown to be useful tools in providing support for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decisions. Aiming to assist European countries in reducing CRC mortality, we developed and validated three regional models for evaluating CRC screening in Europe. Methods. Microsimulation Screening Analysis–Colon (MISCAN-Colon) model versions for Italy, Slovenia, and Finland were quantified using data from different national institutions. These models were validated against the best available evidence for the effectiveness of screening from their region (when available): the Screening for COlon REctum (SCORE) trial and the Florentine fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening study for Italy; the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial and the guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) Finnish population-based study for Finland. When published evidence was not available (Slovenia), the model was validated using cancer registry data. Results. Our three models reproduced age-specific CRC incidence rates and stage distributions in the prescreening period. Moreover, the Italian and Finnish models replicated CRC mortality reductions (reasonably) well against the best available evidence. CRC mortality reductions were predicted slightly larger than those observed (except for the Florentine FIT study), but consistently within the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Conclusions. Our findings corroborate the MISCAN-Colon reliability in supporting decision making on CRC screening. Furthermore, our study provides the model structure for an additional tool (EU-TOPIA CRC evaluation tool: http://miscan.eu-topia.org) that aims to help policymakers and researchers monitoring or improving CRC screening in Europe. SAGE Publications 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7863172/ /pubmed/33598546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468320984974 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Gini, Andrea
Buskermolen, Maaike
Senore, Carlo
Anttila, Ahti
Novak Mlakar, Dominika
Veerus, Piret
Csanádi, Marcell
Jansen, Erik E. L.
Zielonke, Nadine
Heinävaara, Sirpa
Széles, György
Segnan, Nereo
de Koning, Harry J.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title_full Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title_fullStr Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title_short Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
title_sort development and validation of three regional microsimulation models for predicting colorectal cancer screening benefits in europe
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468320984974
work_keys_str_mv AT giniandrea developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT buskermolenmaaike developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT senorecarlo developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT anttilaahti developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT novakmlakardominika developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT veeruspiret developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT csanadimarcell developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT jansenerikel developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT zielonkenadine developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT heinavaarasirpa developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT szelesgyorgy developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT segnannereo developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT dekoningharryj developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope
AT lansdorpvogelaariris developmentandvalidationofthreeregionalmicrosimulationmodelsforpredictingcolorectalcancerscreeningbenefitsineurope