Cargando…

Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shanshan, Zhu, Bo, Zheng, Yiyi, Huang, Guozhi, Zeng, Qi, Wang, Chuhuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04006-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely been reported. This preliminary study aimed to determine if the use of RUSI, as visual biofeedback, could enhance the ability of activation and continuous contraction of the trunk muscles including LM and TrA. METHODS: Forty healthy individuals were included and randomly assigned into the experimental group and control group. All subjects performed a preferential activation of the LM and/or TrA (maintained the constraction of LM and/or TrA for 30 s and then relaxed for 2 min), while those in the experimental group also received visual feedback provided by RUSI. The thickness of LM and/or TrA at rest and during contraction (T(c-max), T(15s), and T(30s)) were extracted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the thickness of LM at rest (P > 0.999), T(c-max) (P > 0.999), and T(15s) (P = 0.414) between the two groups. However, the ability to recruit LM muscle contraction differed between groups at T(30s) (P = 0.006), with subjects in the experimental group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback maintaining a relative maximum contraction. Besides, no significant differences were found in the TrA muscle thickness at rest (P > 0.999) and T(c-max) (P > 0.999) between the two groups. However, significant differences of contraction thickness were found at T(15s) (P = 0.031) and T(30s) (P = 0.010) between the two groups during the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver (ADIM), with greater TrA muscle contraction thickness in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: RUSI can be used to provide visual biofeedback, which can promote continuous contraction, and improve the ability to activate the LM and TrA muscles in healthy subjects.