Cargando…

Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shanshan, Zhu, Bo, Zheng, Yiyi, Huang, Guozhi, Zeng, Qi, Wang, Chuhuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04006-0
_version_ 1783647460389814272
author Lin, Shanshan
Zhu, Bo
Zheng, Yiyi
Huang, Guozhi
Zeng, Qi
Wang, Chuhuai
author_facet Lin, Shanshan
Zhu, Bo
Zheng, Yiyi
Huang, Guozhi
Zeng, Qi
Wang, Chuhuai
author_sort Lin, Shanshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely been reported. This preliminary study aimed to determine if the use of RUSI, as visual biofeedback, could enhance the ability of activation and continuous contraction of the trunk muscles including LM and TrA. METHODS: Forty healthy individuals were included and randomly assigned into the experimental group and control group. All subjects performed a preferential activation of the LM and/or TrA (maintained the constraction of LM and/or TrA for 30 s and then relaxed for 2 min), while those in the experimental group also received visual feedback provided by RUSI. The thickness of LM and/or TrA at rest and during contraction (T(c-max), T(15s), and T(30s)) were extracted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the thickness of LM at rest (P > 0.999), T(c-max) (P > 0.999), and T(15s) (P = 0.414) between the two groups. However, the ability to recruit LM muscle contraction differed between groups at T(30s) (P = 0.006), with subjects in the experimental group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback maintaining a relative maximum contraction. Besides, no significant differences were found in the TrA muscle thickness at rest (P > 0.999) and T(c-max) (P > 0.999) between the two groups. However, significant differences of contraction thickness were found at T(15s) (P = 0.031) and T(30s) (P = 0.010) between the two groups during the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver (ADIM), with greater TrA muscle contraction thickness in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: RUSI can be used to provide visual biofeedback, which can promote continuous contraction, and improve the ability to activate the LM and TrA muscles in healthy subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78632672021-02-05 Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study Lin, Shanshan Zhu, Bo Zheng, Yiyi Huang, Guozhi Zeng, Qi Wang, Chuhuai BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely been reported. This preliminary study aimed to determine if the use of RUSI, as visual biofeedback, could enhance the ability of activation and continuous contraction of the trunk muscles including LM and TrA. METHODS: Forty healthy individuals were included and randomly assigned into the experimental group and control group. All subjects performed a preferential activation of the LM and/or TrA (maintained the constraction of LM and/or TrA for 30 s and then relaxed for 2 min), while those in the experimental group also received visual feedback provided by RUSI. The thickness of LM and/or TrA at rest and during contraction (T(c-max), T(15s), and T(30s)) were extracted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the thickness of LM at rest (P > 0.999), T(c-max) (P > 0.999), and T(15s) (P = 0.414) between the two groups. However, the ability to recruit LM muscle contraction differed between groups at T(30s) (P = 0.006), with subjects in the experimental group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback maintaining a relative maximum contraction. Besides, no significant differences were found in the TrA muscle thickness at rest (P > 0.999) and T(c-max) (P > 0.999) between the two groups. However, significant differences of contraction thickness were found at T(15s) (P = 0.031) and T(30s) (P = 0.010) between the two groups during the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver (ADIM), with greater TrA muscle contraction thickness in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: RUSI can be used to provide visual biofeedback, which can promote continuous contraction, and improve the ability to activate the LM and TrA muscles in healthy subjects. BioMed Central 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7863267/ /pubmed/33546677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04006-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Shanshan
Zhu, Bo
Zheng, Yiyi
Huang, Guozhi
Zeng, Qi
Wang, Chuhuai
Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title_full Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title_fullStr Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title_short Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
title_sort effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04006-0
work_keys_str_mv AT linshanshan effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy
AT zhubo effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy
AT zhengyiyi effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy
AT huangguozhi effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy
AT zengqi effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy
AT wangchuhuai effectofrealtimeultrasoundimagingforbiofeedbackontrunkmusclecontractioninhealthysubjectsapreliminarystudy