Cargando…

The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors

BACKGROUND: The microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as “microbiota”, play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Bruno C. M., Murray, Maureen, Tseng, Florina, Widmer, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00035-7
_version_ 1783647480227823616
author Oliveira, Bruno C. M.
Murray, Maureen
Tseng, Florina
Widmer, Giovanni
author_facet Oliveira, Bruno C. M.
Murray, Maureen
Tseng, Florina
Widmer, Giovanni
author_sort Oliveira, Bruno C. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as “microbiota”, play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many years, much less is known about the microbiota populating the intestinal tract of wild animals. RESULTS: The relatively large number of raptors admitted to the Tufts Wildlife Clinic on the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University campus provided a unique opportunity to investigate the bacterial microbiota in these birds. Opportunistic collection of fecal samples from raptors of 7 different species in the orders Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, and Falconiformes with different medical histories generated a collection of 46 microbiota samples. Based on 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA, large β-diversity values were observed. Many comparisons exceeded weighted UniFrac distances of 0.9. Microbiota diversity did not segregate with the taxonomy of the host; no significant difference between microbiota from Strigiformes and from Accipitriformes/Falconiformes were observed. In contrast, in a sample of 22 birds admitted for rehabilitation, a significant effect of captivity was found. The change in microbiota profile was driven by an expansion of the proportion of Actinobacteria. Based on a small number of raptors treated with anti-microbials, no significant effect of these treatments on microbiota α-diversity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of “meta-organism conservation”, i.e., conservation efforts focused on the host and its intestinal microbiome has recently been proposed. The observed effect of captivity on the fecal microbiota is relevant to understanding the response of wildlife to captivity and optimizing wildlife rehabilitation and conservation efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78633742021-02-08 The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors Oliveira, Bruno C. M. Murray, Maureen Tseng, Florina Widmer, Giovanni Anim Microbiome Research Article BACKGROUND: The microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as “microbiota”, play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many years, much less is known about the microbiota populating the intestinal tract of wild animals. RESULTS: The relatively large number of raptors admitted to the Tufts Wildlife Clinic on the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University campus provided a unique opportunity to investigate the bacterial microbiota in these birds. Opportunistic collection of fecal samples from raptors of 7 different species in the orders Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, and Falconiformes with different medical histories generated a collection of 46 microbiota samples. Based on 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA, large β-diversity values were observed. Many comparisons exceeded weighted UniFrac distances of 0.9. Microbiota diversity did not segregate with the taxonomy of the host; no significant difference between microbiota from Strigiformes and from Accipitriformes/Falconiformes were observed. In contrast, in a sample of 22 birds admitted for rehabilitation, a significant effect of captivity was found. The change in microbiota profile was driven by an expansion of the proportion of Actinobacteria. Based on a small number of raptors treated with anti-microbials, no significant effect of these treatments on microbiota α-diversity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of “meta-organism conservation”, i.e., conservation efforts focused on the host and its intestinal microbiome has recently been proposed. The observed effect of captivity on the fecal microbiota is relevant to understanding the response of wildlife to captivity and optimizing wildlife rehabilitation and conservation efforts. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7863374/ /pubmed/33499952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00035-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oliveira, Bruno C. M.
Murray, Maureen
Tseng, Florina
Widmer, Giovanni
The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title_full The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title_fullStr The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title_full_unstemmed The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title_short The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
title_sort fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00035-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirabrunocm thefecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT murraymaureen thefecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT tsengflorina thefecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT widmergiovanni thefecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT oliveirabrunocm fecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT murraymaureen fecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT tsengflorina fecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors
AT widmergiovanni fecalmicrobiotaofwildandcaptiveraptors