Cargando…

Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid

1. Interference competition occurs when access to an available resource is negatively affected by interactions with other individuals, where mutual interference involves individuals of the same species. The interactive phenomena among individuals may be size‐dependent, since body size is a major fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papanikolaou, Nikos E., Dervisoglou, Sofia, Fantinou, Argyro, Kypraios, Theodore, Giakoumaki, Valmari, Perdikis, Dionysios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7137
_version_ 1783647481644449792
author Papanikolaou, Nikos E.
Dervisoglou, Sofia
Fantinou, Argyro
Kypraios, Theodore
Giakoumaki, Valmari
Perdikis, Dionysios
author_facet Papanikolaou, Nikos E.
Dervisoglou, Sofia
Fantinou, Argyro
Kypraios, Theodore
Giakoumaki, Valmari
Perdikis, Dionysios
author_sort Papanikolaou, Nikos E.
collection PubMed
description 1. Interference competition occurs when access to an available resource is negatively affected by interactions with other individuals, where mutual interference involves individuals of the same species. The interactive phenomena among individuals may be size‐dependent, since body size is a major factor that may alter prey consumption rates and ultimately the dynamics and structure of food webs. 2. A study was initiated in order to evaluate the effect of mutual interference in the prey‐specific attack rates and handling times of same size class predators, incorporating variation in consumer size. For this purpose, laboratory functional response experiments were conducted using same age predators, that is, newly hatched (first instar) or mature (fifth instar) nymphs of the polyphagous mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs. 3. The experiments involved four predator density treatments, that is, one, two, three, or four predators of same age, that is, either first‐ or fifth‐instar nymphs, which were exposed to several prey densities. The Crowley–Martin model, which allows for interference competition between foraging predators, was used to fit the data. 4. The results showed that mutual interference between predator's nymphs may occur that affect their foraging efficiency. The values of the attack rate coefficient were dependent on the predator density and for the first‐instar nymphs were significantly lower at the highest predator density than the lower predator densities, whereas for the fifth‐instar nymphs in all density treatments were significantly lower to that of the individual foragers' ones. 5. These results indicate that mutual interference is more intense for larger predators and is more obvious at low prey densities where the competition level is higher. The wider use of predator‐dependent functional response models will help toward a mechanistic understanding of intraspecific interactions and its consequences on the stability and structure of food webs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78633802021-02-16 Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid Papanikolaou, Nikos E. Dervisoglou, Sofia Fantinou, Argyro Kypraios, Theodore Giakoumaki, Valmari Perdikis, Dionysios Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Interference competition occurs when access to an available resource is negatively affected by interactions with other individuals, where mutual interference involves individuals of the same species. The interactive phenomena among individuals may be size‐dependent, since body size is a major factor that may alter prey consumption rates and ultimately the dynamics and structure of food webs. 2. A study was initiated in order to evaluate the effect of mutual interference in the prey‐specific attack rates and handling times of same size class predators, incorporating variation in consumer size. For this purpose, laboratory functional response experiments were conducted using same age predators, that is, newly hatched (first instar) or mature (fifth instar) nymphs of the polyphagous mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs. 3. The experiments involved four predator density treatments, that is, one, two, three, or four predators of same age, that is, either first‐ or fifth‐instar nymphs, which were exposed to several prey densities. The Crowley–Martin model, which allows for interference competition between foraging predators, was used to fit the data. 4. The results showed that mutual interference between predator's nymphs may occur that affect their foraging efficiency. The values of the attack rate coefficient were dependent on the predator density and for the first‐instar nymphs were significantly lower at the highest predator density than the lower predator densities, whereas for the fifth‐instar nymphs in all density treatments were significantly lower to that of the individual foragers' ones. 5. These results indicate that mutual interference is more intense for larger predators and is more obvious at low prey densities where the competition level is higher. The wider use of predator‐dependent functional response models will help toward a mechanistic understanding of intraspecific interactions and its consequences on the stability and structure of food webs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7863380/ /pubmed/33598135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7137 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Papanikolaou, Nikos E.
Dervisoglou, Sofia
Fantinou, Argyro
Kypraios, Theodore
Giakoumaki, Valmari
Perdikis, Dionysios
Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title_full Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title_fullStr Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title_full_unstemmed Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title_short Predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
title_sort predator size affects the intensity of mutual interference in a predatory mirid
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7137
work_keys_str_mv AT papanikolaounikose predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid
AT dervisoglousofia predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid
AT fantinouargyro predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid
AT kypraiostheodore predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid
AT giakoumakivalmari predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid
AT perdikisdionysios predatorsizeaffectstheintensityofmutualinterferenceinapredatorymirid