Cargando…

Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models

1. Capture–recapture experiments are conducted to estimate population parameters such as population size, survival rates, and capture rates. Typically, individuals are captured and given unique tags, then recaptured over several time periods with the assumption that these tags are not lost. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Wei, Yurchak, Stephanie, Cole, Diana J., Cowen, Laura L. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7035
_version_ 1783647494256721920
author Cai, Wei
Yurchak, Stephanie
Cole, Diana J.
Cowen, Laura L. E.
author_facet Cai, Wei
Yurchak, Stephanie
Cole, Diana J.
Cowen, Laura L. E.
author_sort Cai, Wei
collection PubMed
description 1. Capture–recapture experiments are conducted to estimate population parameters such as population size, survival rates, and capture rates. Typically, individuals are captured and given unique tags, then recaptured over several time periods with the assumption that these tags are not lost. However, for some populations, tag loss cannot be assumed negligible. The Jolly‐Seber tag loss model is used when the no‐tag‐loss assumption is invalid. Further, the model has been extended to incorporate group heterogeneity, which allows parameters to vary by group membership. Many mark–recapture models become overparameterized resulting in the inability to independently estimate parameters. This is known as parameter redundancy. 2. We investigate parameter redundancy using symbolic methods. Because of the complex structure of some tag loss models, the methods cannot always be applied directly. Instead, we develop a simple combination of parameters that can be used to investigate parameter redundancy in tag loss models. 3. The incorporation of tag loss and group heterogeneity into Jolly‐Seber models does not result in further parameter redundancies. Furthermore, using hybrid methods we studied the parameter redundancy caused by data through case studies and generated tag histories with different parameter values. 4. Smaller capture and survival rates are found to cause parameter redundancy in these models. These problems resolve when applied to large populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78634372021-02-16 Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models Cai, Wei Yurchak, Stephanie Cole, Diana J. Cowen, Laura L. E. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Capture–recapture experiments are conducted to estimate population parameters such as population size, survival rates, and capture rates. Typically, individuals are captured and given unique tags, then recaptured over several time periods with the assumption that these tags are not lost. However, for some populations, tag loss cannot be assumed negligible. The Jolly‐Seber tag loss model is used when the no‐tag‐loss assumption is invalid. Further, the model has been extended to incorporate group heterogeneity, which allows parameters to vary by group membership. Many mark–recapture models become overparameterized resulting in the inability to independently estimate parameters. This is known as parameter redundancy. 2. We investigate parameter redundancy using symbolic methods. Because of the complex structure of some tag loss models, the methods cannot always be applied directly. Instead, we develop a simple combination of parameters that can be used to investigate parameter redundancy in tag loss models. 3. The incorporation of tag loss and group heterogeneity into Jolly‐Seber models does not result in further parameter redundancies. Furthermore, using hybrid methods we studied the parameter redundancy caused by data through case studies and generated tag histories with different parameter values. 4. Smaller capture and survival rates are found to cause parameter redundancy in these models. These problems resolve when applied to large populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7863437/ /pubmed/33598119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7035 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cai, Wei
Yurchak, Stephanie
Cole, Diana J.
Cowen, Laura L. E.
Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title_full Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title_fullStr Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title_full_unstemmed Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title_short Parameter redundancy in Jolly‐Seber tag loss models
title_sort parameter redundancy in jolly‐seber tag loss models
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7035
work_keys_str_mv AT caiwei parameterredundancyinjollysebertaglossmodels
AT yurchakstephanie parameterredundancyinjollysebertaglossmodels
AT coledianaj parameterredundancyinjollysebertaglossmodels
AT cowenlaurale parameterredundancyinjollysebertaglossmodels