Cargando…

Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees

BACKGROUND: An indicated prevention strategy (IPS), consisting of a screening questionnaire and early treatment, was found to be effective for the prevention of future long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in two large Dutch RCT’s. This IPS aims to detect employees who have a high risk to become absent,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klasen, Sophie H., van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G. P. M., Houkes, Inge, Jansen, Nicole W. H., Kant, IJmert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w
_version_ 1783647511489019904
author Klasen, Sophie H.
van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G. P. M.
Houkes, Inge
Jansen, Nicole W. H.
Kant, IJmert
author_facet Klasen, Sophie H.
van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G. P. M.
Houkes, Inge
Jansen, Nicole W. H.
Kant, IJmert
author_sort Klasen, Sophie H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An indicated prevention strategy (IPS), consisting of a screening questionnaire and early treatment, was found to be effective for the prevention of future long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in two large Dutch RCT’s. This IPS aims to detect employees who have a high risk to become absent, and subsequently offer them early treatment. Despite the overall effectiveness, only a few companies have implemented this strategy so far. This suggests that companies may not be convinced of the (cost) effectiveness of this strategy yet. In companies where IPS has been implemented, screenings uptake and adherence to early treatment appeared to be moderate, indicating that both employees and employers might perceive barriers. METHODS: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the expected and perceived facilitators and barriers for the implementation of the IPS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 employers and 11 employees (acquainted and unacquainted with IPS) from large companies. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The employers believed they were primarily responsible for psychological and work-related health complaints and SA, while the employees felt responsible for health complaints related to their lifestyle. According to the employees, the responsibility of the employer was solely related to work-related health. This finding exposed a relation with the health culture, which was solely based on creating a safe work environment, omitting psychological health issues. The efficacy of this IPS regarding reducing SA was estimated positive, however, the efficacy regarding LTSA was questioned. Fear of a privacy breach was often mentioned by the respondents as an important barrier. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the health culture within a company may be important for the perceived responsibility towards SA and health. A health culture which primarily focuses on physical complaints may raise barriers for the adoption and implementation of this preventive strategy. Participant’ perceptions of the nature of LTSA and the fact that not all participants were familiar with the exact content and phasing of IPS may have doubted the efficacy regarding LTSA. This study provides important clues for future and improved implementation of IPS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78635222021-02-08 Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees Klasen, Sophie H. van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G. P. M. Houkes, Inge Jansen, Nicole W. H. Kant, IJmert BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: An indicated prevention strategy (IPS), consisting of a screening questionnaire and early treatment, was found to be effective for the prevention of future long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in two large Dutch RCT’s. This IPS aims to detect employees who have a high risk to become absent, and subsequently offer them early treatment. Despite the overall effectiveness, only a few companies have implemented this strategy so far. This suggests that companies may not be convinced of the (cost) effectiveness of this strategy yet. In companies where IPS has been implemented, screenings uptake and adherence to early treatment appeared to be moderate, indicating that both employees and employers might perceive barriers. METHODS: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the expected and perceived facilitators and barriers for the implementation of the IPS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 employers and 11 employees (acquainted and unacquainted with IPS) from large companies. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The employers believed they were primarily responsible for psychological and work-related health complaints and SA, while the employees felt responsible for health complaints related to their lifestyle. According to the employees, the responsibility of the employer was solely related to work-related health. This finding exposed a relation with the health culture, which was solely based on creating a safe work environment, omitting psychological health issues. The efficacy of this IPS regarding reducing SA was estimated positive, however, the efficacy regarding LTSA was questioned. Fear of a privacy breach was often mentioned by the respondents as an important barrier. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the health culture within a company may be important for the perceived responsibility towards SA and health. A health culture which primarily focuses on physical complaints may raise barriers for the adoption and implementation of this preventive strategy. Participant’ perceptions of the nature of LTSA and the fact that not all participants were familiar with the exact content and phasing of IPS may have doubted the efficacy regarding LTSA. This study provides important clues for future and improved implementation of IPS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w. BioMed Central 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7863522/ /pubmed/33541315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klasen, Sophie H.
van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G. P. M.
Houkes, Inge
Jansen, Nicole W. H.
Kant, IJmert
Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title_full Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title_fullStr Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title_full_unstemmed Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title_short Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
title_sort exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w
work_keys_str_mv AT klasensophieh exploringexpectedandperceivedfacilitatorsandbarriersofanindicatedpreventionstrategytopreventfuturelongtermsicknessabsenceaqualitativestudyamongemployersandemployees
AT vanamelsvoortludovicgpm exploringexpectedandperceivedfacilitatorsandbarriersofanindicatedpreventionstrategytopreventfuturelongtermsicknessabsenceaqualitativestudyamongemployersandemployees
AT houkesinge exploringexpectedandperceivedfacilitatorsandbarriersofanindicatedpreventionstrategytopreventfuturelongtermsicknessabsenceaqualitativestudyamongemployersandemployees
AT jansennicolewh exploringexpectedandperceivedfacilitatorsandbarriersofanindicatedpreventionstrategytopreventfuturelongtermsicknessabsenceaqualitativestudyamongemployersandemployees
AT kantijmert exploringexpectedandperceivedfacilitatorsandbarriersofanindicatedpreventionstrategytopreventfuturelongtermsicknessabsenceaqualitativestudyamongemployersandemployees