Cargando…

Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION: Due to higher morbidity and mortality, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) causes many public health problems. AIM: To observe effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and ischemic postconditioning (IPC) on patients diagnosed as STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Haozhou, Yang, Lei, Wang, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597992
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.99262
_version_ 1783647550517018624
author Zhang, Haozhou
Yang, Lei
Wang, Lei
author_facet Zhang, Haozhou
Yang, Lei
Wang, Lei
author_sort Zhang, Haozhou
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Due to higher morbidity and mortality, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) causes many public health problems. AIM: To observe effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and ischemic postconditioning (IPC) on patients diagnosed as STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted using indirect comparison by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). We conducted searches by utilizing PubMed and the other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that described IPC or RIC treated patients diagnosed with STEMI during processes of pPCI. Enzymatic infarct size and infarction size were evaluated and cardiac events were assessed during the follow-up. RESULTS: Pooled results showed that lower enzymatic infarction size was associated with the RIC group compared to the IPC group (IPC vs. RIC: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.126; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.756–1.677). Compared with IPC, RIC significantly reduced infarction size, which was assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (SMD = 1.113; 95% CI: 0.674–1.837). We noted a potential toward greater complete ST-segment resolution in RIC patients compared with IPC patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.821; 95% CI: 0.166–4.051). No significant difference existed in all-cause mortality (OR = 2.211; 95% CI: 0.845–5.784), Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.001–.662) or re-infarction (OR = 1.763; 95% CI: 0.741–4.193). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested RIC was correlated with significantly smaller infarction size compared to IPC. No significant superiority between RIC and IPC has been observed in this study on cSTR incidence, mortality and re-infarction or TVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7863805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78638052021-02-16 Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Zhang, Haozhou Yang, Lei Wang, Lei Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Due to higher morbidity and mortality, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) causes many public health problems. AIM: To observe effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and ischemic postconditioning (IPC) on patients diagnosed as STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted using indirect comparison by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). We conducted searches by utilizing PubMed and the other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that described IPC or RIC treated patients diagnosed with STEMI during processes of pPCI. Enzymatic infarct size and infarction size were evaluated and cardiac events were assessed during the follow-up. RESULTS: Pooled results showed that lower enzymatic infarction size was associated with the RIC group compared to the IPC group (IPC vs. RIC: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.126; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.756–1.677). Compared with IPC, RIC significantly reduced infarction size, which was assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (SMD = 1.113; 95% CI: 0.674–1.837). We noted a potential toward greater complete ST-segment resolution in RIC patients compared with IPC patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.821; 95% CI: 0.166–4.051). No significant difference existed in all-cause mortality (OR = 2.211; 95% CI: 0.845–5.784), Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.001–.662) or re-infarction (OR = 1.763; 95% CI: 0.741–4.193). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested RIC was correlated with significantly smaller infarction size compared to IPC. No significant superiority between RIC and IPC has been observed in this study on cSTR incidence, mortality and re-infarction or TVR. Termedia Publishing House 2020-10-02 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7863805/ /pubmed/33597992 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.99262 Text en Copyright © 2020 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhang, Haozhou
Yang, Lei
Wang, Lei
Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort comparison of infarction size, complete st-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597992
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.99262
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghaozhou comparisonofinfarctionsizecompletestsegmentresolutionincidencemortalityandreinfarctionandtargetvesselrevascularizationbetweenremoteischemicconditioningandischemicpostconditioninginstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneous
AT yanglei comparisonofinfarctionsizecompletestsegmentresolutionincidencemortalityandreinfarctionandtargetvesselrevascularizationbetweenremoteischemicconditioningandischemicpostconditioninginstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneous
AT wanglei comparisonofinfarctionsizecompletestsegmentresolutionincidencemortalityandreinfarctionandtargetvesselrevascularizationbetweenremoteischemicconditioningandischemicpostconditioninginstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneous