Cargando…

Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types

Aim: The purpose of the study was to define and then to compare particularly the morphological profiles of the main morphological types of esophageal carcinoma (EC). Patients, Materials and Methods: The studied group included 46 operated EC patients. Few parameters were clinical (gender and age). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameniţă, Dan, Demetrian, Alin Dragoş, Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail, Tănasie-Vasile, Manuela Ioana, Strâmbu, Victor Dan Eugen, Grigorean, Valentin Titus, Ioniţă, Elena, Pleşea, Iancu Emil, Marincaş, Augustin Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544792
http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.2.10
_version_ 1783647638212575232
author Cameniţă, Dan
Demetrian, Alin Dragoş
Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail
Tănasie-Vasile, Manuela Ioana
Strâmbu, Victor Dan Eugen
Grigorean, Valentin Titus
Ioniţă, Elena
Pleşea, Iancu Emil
Marincaş, Augustin Marian
author_facet Cameniţă, Dan
Demetrian, Alin Dragoş
Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail
Tănasie-Vasile, Manuela Ioana
Strâmbu, Victor Dan Eugen
Grigorean, Valentin Titus
Ioniţă, Elena
Pleşea, Iancu Emil
Marincaş, Augustin Marian
author_sort Cameniţă, Dan
collection PubMed
description Aim: The purpose of the study was to define and then to compare particularly the morphological profiles of the main morphological types of esophageal carcinoma (EC). Patients, Materials and Methods: The studied group included 46 operated EC patients. Few parameters were clinical (gender and age). The rest of them described both gross and histological features of the entire group and of the two main histological types of carcinoma (lesion’ site, lateral extension, lesion dimensions, gross aspect, and histological type, and tumor grade, and stage). Stratification scales of cases were defined according to each parameter in order to compare the data and a statistical apparatus [Student’s t-test and χ(2) (chi-squared) test] was used. Results: The studied tumors were encountered mostly in mature adult and elderly men, usually in the lower segments of the esophagus. Many of them had between five and ten cm in the long diameter and produced stenosis. Most of them had infiltrating appearance combined often with protruding or/and ulcerated aspects. Usually, the tumors were poorly differentiated and in stage III. The two main histological types of EC showed different morphological profiles. Data from the literature revealed sometimes wide ranges of variation for the studied morphological parameters. Our results were within these ranges of variation. Conclusions: ECs proved to be aggressive and late diagnosed tumors in general, with distinct morphological and behavioral profiles for the two main histological types. Comparisons with literature data confirmed many of our observations regarding the clinical and morphological aspects of both ECs as a whole and its histological types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7864308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78643082021-02-08 Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types Cameniţă, Dan Demetrian, Alin Dragoş Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail Tănasie-Vasile, Manuela Ioana Strâmbu, Victor Dan Eugen Grigorean, Valentin Titus Ioniţă, Elena Pleşea, Iancu Emil Marincaş, Augustin Marian Rom J Morphol Embryol Original Paper Aim: The purpose of the study was to define and then to compare particularly the morphological profiles of the main morphological types of esophageal carcinoma (EC). Patients, Materials and Methods: The studied group included 46 operated EC patients. Few parameters were clinical (gender and age). The rest of them described both gross and histological features of the entire group and of the two main histological types of carcinoma (lesion’ site, lateral extension, lesion dimensions, gross aspect, and histological type, and tumor grade, and stage). Stratification scales of cases were defined according to each parameter in order to compare the data and a statistical apparatus [Student’s t-test and χ(2) (chi-squared) test] was used. Results: The studied tumors were encountered mostly in mature adult and elderly men, usually in the lower segments of the esophagus. Many of them had between five and ten cm in the long diameter and produced stenosis. Most of them had infiltrating appearance combined often with protruding or/and ulcerated aspects. Usually, the tumors were poorly differentiated and in stage III. The two main histological types of EC showed different morphological profiles. Data from the literature revealed sometimes wide ranges of variation for the studied morphological parameters. Our results were within these ranges of variation. Conclusions: ECs proved to be aggressive and late diagnosed tumors in general, with distinct morphological and behavioral profiles for the two main histological types. Comparisons with literature data confirmed many of our observations regarding the clinical and morphological aspects of both ECs as a whole and its histological types. Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest 2020 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7864308/ /pubmed/33544792 http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.2.10 Text en Copyright © 2020, Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License, which permits unrestricted use, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium, non-commercially, provided the new creations are licensed under identical terms as the original work and the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cameniţă, Dan
Demetrian, Alin Dragoş
Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail
Tănasie-Vasile, Manuela Ioana
Strâmbu, Victor Dan Eugen
Grigorean, Valentin Titus
Ioniţă, Elena
Pleşea, Iancu Emil
Marincaş, Augustin Marian
Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title_full Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title_fullStr Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title_full_unstemmed Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title_short Clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
title_sort clinical–morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma’s main types
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544792
http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.2.10
work_keys_str_mv AT camenitadan clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT demetrianalindragos clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT plesearazvanmihail clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT tanasievasilemanuelaioana clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT strambuvictordaneugen clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT grigoreanvalentintitus clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT ionitaelena clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT pleseaiancuemil clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes
AT marincasaugustinmarian clinicalmorphologicalprofilesofesophagealcarcinomasmaintypes