Cargando…
Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review
OBJECTIVES: Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) save lives, treatment retention remains challenging. Identification of interventions to improve MOUD retention is of interest to policymakers and researchers. On behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we conducted a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000739 |
_version_ | 1783647690112892928 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Brian Gean, Emily Arkhipova-Jenkins, Irina Gilbert, Jennifer Hilgart, Jennifer Fiordalisi, Celia Hubbard, Kimberly Brandt, Irene Stoeger, Elizabeth Paynter, Robin Korthuis, Philip Todd Guise, Jeanne-Marie |
author_facet | Chan, Brian Gean, Emily Arkhipova-Jenkins, Irina Gilbert, Jennifer Hilgart, Jennifer Fiordalisi, Celia Hubbard, Kimberly Brandt, Irene Stoeger, Elizabeth Paynter, Robin Korthuis, Philip Todd Guise, Jeanne-Marie |
author_sort | Chan, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) save lives, treatment retention remains challenging. Identification of interventions to improve MOUD retention is of interest to policymakers and researchers. On behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we conducted a rapid evidence review on interventions to improve MOUD retention. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from February 2009 through August 2019 for systematic reviews and randomized trials of care settings, services, logistical support, contingency management, health information technology (IT), extended-release (XR) formulations, and psychosocial interventions that assessed retention at least 3 months. RESULTS: Two systematic reviews and 39 primary studies were included; most did not focus on retention as the primary outcome. Initiating MOUD in soon-to-be-released incarcerated people improved retention following release. Contingency management may improve retention using antagonist but not agonist MOUD. Retention with interventions integrating medical, psychiatric, social services, or IT did not differ from in-person treatment-as-usual approaches. Retention was comparable with XR- compared to daily buprenorphine formulations and conflicting with XR-naltrexone monthly injection compared to daily buprenorphine. Most psychosocial interventions did not improve retention. DISCUSSION: Consistent but sparse evidence supports criminal justice prerelease MOUD initiation, and contingency management interventions for antagonist MOUD. Integrating MOUD with medical, psychiatric, social services, delivering through IT, or administering via XR-MOUD formulations did not worsen retention. Fewer than half of the studies we identified focused on retention as a primary outcome. Studies used different measures of retention, making it difficult to compare effectiveness. Additional inquiry into the causes of low retention would inform future interventions. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42019134739 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7864607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78646072021-02-08 Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review Chan, Brian Gean, Emily Arkhipova-Jenkins, Irina Gilbert, Jennifer Hilgart, Jennifer Fiordalisi, Celia Hubbard, Kimberly Brandt, Irene Stoeger, Elizabeth Paynter, Robin Korthuis, Philip Todd Guise, Jeanne-Marie J Addict Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) save lives, treatment retention remains challenging. Identification of interventions to improve MOUD retention is of interest to policymakers and researchers. On behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we conducted a rapid evidence review on interventions to improve MOUD retention. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from February 2009 through August 2019 for systematic reviews and randomized trials of care settings, services, logistical support, contingency management, health information technology (IT), extended-release (XR) formulations, and psychosocial interventions that assessed retention at least 3 months. RESULTS: Two systematic reviews and 39 primary studies were included; most did not focus on retention as the primary outcome. Initiating MOUD in soon-to-be-released incarcerated people improved retention following release. Contingency management may improve retention using antagonist but not agonist MOUD. Retention with interventions integrating medical, psychiatric, social services, or IT did not differ from in-person treatment-as-usual approaches. Retention was comparable with XR- compared to daily buprenorphine formulations and conflicting with XR-naltrexone monthly injection compared to daily buprenorphine. Most psychosocial interventions did not improve retention. DISCUSSION: Consistent but sparse evidence supports criminal justice prerelease MOUD initiation, and contingency management interventions for antagonist MOUD. Integrating MOUD with medical, psychiatric, social services, delivering through IT, or administering via XR-MOUD formulations did not worsen retention. Fewer than half of the studies we identified focused on retention as a primary outcome. Studies used different measures of retention, making it difficult to compare effectiveness. Additional inquiry into the causes of low retention would inform future interventions. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42019134739 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7864607/ /pubmed/32956162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000739 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Addiction Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chan, Brian Gean, Emily Arkhipova-Jenkins, Irina Gilbert, Jennifer Hilgart, Jennifer Fiordalisi, Celia Hubbard, Kimberly Brandt, Irene Stoeger, Elizabeth Paynter, Robin Korthuis, Philip Todd Guise, Jeanne-Marie Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title | Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title_full | Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title_fullStr | Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title_short | Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review |
title_sort | retention strategies for medications for opioid use disorder in adults: a rapid evidence review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanbrian retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT geanemily retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT arkhipovajenkinsirina retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT gilbertjennifer retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT hilgartjennifer retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT fiordalisicelia retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT hubbardkimberly retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT brandtirene retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT stoegerelizabeth retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT paynterrobin retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT korthuisphiliptodd retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview AT guisejeannemarie retentionstrategiesformedicationsforopioidusedisorderinadultsarapidevidencereview |