Cargando…

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?

Despite advances in clinical management, a proportion of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) recur after local treatment. The concept of neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been widely adopted to improve clinical outcomes of patients with TNBC and other breast tumour types. R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fountzila, Elena, Ignatiadis, Michail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1147
_version_ 1783647699611942912
author Fountzila, Elena
Ignatiadis, Michail
author_facet Fountzila, Elena
Ignatiadis, Michail
author_sort Fountzila, Elena
collection PubMed
description Despite advances in clinical management, a proportion of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) recur after local treatment. The concept of neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been widely adopted to improve clinical outcomes of patients with TNBC and other breast tumour types. Recently, promising data were reported from the first prospective phase III, randomised trial assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with early-stage TNBC. The addition of pembrolizumab resulted in a significant increase in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. Similarly, in the IMpassion031 trial, the use of atezolizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC led to improved pCR rates compared to placebo, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Ongoing trials are testing other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC and other tumour subtypes. However, not all patients benefit from the addition of immunotherapy, while a proportion of patients experiences serious adverse events. It is critical to identify predictive biomarkers of response, to accurately select patients who will benefit from immunotherapy, thus sparing the rest from ineffective treatments with unnecessary toxicity and treatment costs. In this review, we summarise the literature on reported and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7864681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78646812021-02-10 Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift? Fountzila, Elena Ignatiadis, Michail Ecancermedicalscience Review Despite advances in clinical management, a proportion of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) recur after local treatment. The concept of neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been widely adopted to improve clinical outcomes of patients with TNBC and other breast tumour types. Recently, promising data were reported from the first prospective phase III, randomised trial assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with early-stage TNBC. The addition of pembrolizumab resulted in a significant increase in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. Similarly, in the IMpassion031 trial, the use of atezolizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC led to improved pCR rates compared to placebo, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Ongoing trials are testing other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC and other tumour subtypes. However, not all patients benefit from the addition of immunotherapy, while a proportion of patients experiences serious adverse events. It is critical to identify predictive biomarkers of response, to accurately select patients who will benefit from immunotherapy, thus sparing the rest from ineffective treatments with unnecessary toxicity and treatment costs. In this review, we summarise the literature on reported and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Intelligence 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7864681/ /pubmed/33574892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1147 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Fountzila, Elena
Ignatiadis, Michail
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title_full Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title_short Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
title_sort neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1147
work_keys_str_mv AT fountzilaelena neoadjuvantimmunotherapyinbreastcanceraparadigmshift
AT ignatiadismichail neoadjuvantimmunotherapyinbreastcanceraparadigmshift