Cargando…
Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158 |
_version_ | 1783647700058636288 |
---|---|
author | de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana Koller, Francisco José Marcondes, Larissa de Fátima Mantovani, Maria Marcon, Sonia Silva Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski |
author_facet | de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana Koller, Francisco José Marcondes, Larissa de Fátima Mantovani, Maria Marcon, Sonia Silva Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski |
author_sort | de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel the effects of this serious adverse event, however, the discussion on the theme and research concerning these issues is scarce and an instrument for evaluation can help in the promotion of coping strategies. Thus, the study objective was to: 1) translate and adapt the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire to Brazilian culture and 2) evaluate the COST psychometric properties in Brazil. Thus, a methodological study was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed, and in the second stage, two groups of participants were recruited to evaluate the psychometric properties. In the first stage, 21 individuals participated, including translators and cancer patients, and in the second stage, 126 patients participated who were undergoing cancer treatment. For validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed to verify internal consistency. For the first stage’s outcome, the pre-test Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83. The EFA and CFA carried out in the second stage of the study revealed that the COST Brazilian version measures a single construct with a value of—χ2/gl = 179.78, comparative fit index = 0.00, Parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.302, root mean square error of approximation = 1.196 and p-value of close fit = 0.000. When comparing the average of the COST score and the standard deviation of the two samples, the significance value was p = 0.001. Therefore, it is possible to confirm that the COST is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the financial toxicity of cancer patients in Brazil. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7864683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78646832021-02-10 Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana Koller, Francisco José Marcondes, Larissa de Fátima Mantovani, Maria Marcon, Sonia Silva Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski Ecancermedicalscience Research Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel the effects of this serious adverse event, however, the discussion on the theme and research concerning these issues is scarce and an instrument for evaluation can help in the promotion of coping strategies. Thus, the study objective was to: 1) translate and adapt the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire to Brazilian culture and 2) evaluate the COST psychometric properties in Brazil. Thus, a methodological study was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed, and in the second stage, two groups of participants were recruited to evaluate the psychometric properties. In the first stage, 21 individuals participated, including translators and cancer patients, and in the second stage, 126 patients participated who were undergoing cancer treatment. For validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed to verify internal consistency. For the first stage’s outcome, the pre-test Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83. The EFA and CFA carried out in the second stage of the study revealed that the COST Brazilian version measures a single construct with a value of—χ2/gl = 179.78, comparative fit index = 0.00, Parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.302, root mean square error of approximation = 1.196 and p-value of close fit = 0.000. When comparing the average of the COST score and the standard deviation of the two samples, the significance value was p = 0.001. Therefore, it is possible to confirm that the COST is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the financial toxicity of cancer patients in Brazil. Cancer Intelligence 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7864683/ /pubmed/33574903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana Koller, Francisco José Marcondes, Larissa de Fátima Mantovani, Maria Marcon, Sonia Silva Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title | Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title_full | Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title_fullStr | Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title_short | Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture |
title_sort | validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for brazilian culture |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dealcantaranogueiraluciana validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT kollerfranciscojose validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT marcondeslarissa validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT defatimamantovanimaria validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT marconsoniasilva validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT guimaraespauloricardobittencourt validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture AT kalinkelucianapuchalski validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture |