Cargando…

Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture

Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana, Koller, Francisco José, Marcondes, Larissa, de Fátima Mantovani, Maria, Marcon, Sonia Silva, Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt, Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158
_version_ 1783647700058636288
author de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana
Koller, Francisco José
Marcondes, Larissa
de Fátima Mantovani, Maria
Marcon, Sonia Silva
Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski
author_facet de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana
Koller, Francisco José
Marcondes, Larissa
de Fátima Mantovani, Maria
Marcon, Sonia Silva
Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski
author_sort de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana
collection PubMed
description Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel the effects of this serious adverse event, however, the discussion on the theme and research concerning these issues is scarce and an instrument for evaluation can help in the promotion of coping strategies. Thus, the study objective was to: 1) translate and adapt the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire to Brazilian culture and 2) evaluate the COST psychometric properties in Brazil. Thus, a methodological study was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed, and in the second stage, two groups of participants were recruited to evaluate the psychometric properties. In the first stage, 21 individuals participated, including translators and cancer patients, and in the second stage, 126 patients participated who were undergoing cancer treatment. For validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed to verify internal consistency. For the first stage’s outcome, the pre-test Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83. The EFA and CFA carried out in the second stage of the study revealed that the COST Brazilian version measures a single construct with a value of—χ2/gl = 179.78, comparative fit index = 0.00, Parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.302, root mean square error of approximation = 1.196 and p-value of close fit = 0.000. When comparing the average of the COST score and the standard deviation of the two samples, the significance value was p = 0.001. Therefore, it is possible to confirm that the COST is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the financial toxicity of cancer patients in Brazil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7864683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78646832021-02-10 Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana Koller, Francisco José Marcondes, Larissa de Fátima Mantovani, Maria Marcon, Sonia Silva Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski Ecancermedicalscience Research Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel the effects of this serious adverse event, however, the discussion on the theme and research concerning these issues is scarce and an instrument for evaluation can help in the promotion of coping strategies. Thus, the study objective was to: 1) translate and adapt the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire to Brazilian culture and 2) evaluate the COST psychometric properties in Brazil. Thus, a methodological study was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed, and in the second stage, two groups of participants were recruited to evaluate the psychometric properties. In the first stage, 21 individuals participated, including translators and cancer patients, and in the second stage, 126 patients participated who were undergoing cancer treatment. For validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed to verify internal consistency. For the first stage’s outcome, the pre-test Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83. The EFA and CFA carried out in the second stage of the study revealed that the COST Brazilian version measures a single construct with a value of—χ2/gl = 179.78, comparative fit index = 0.00, Parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.302, root mean square error of approximation = 1.196 and p-value of close fit = 0.000. When comparing the average of the COST score and the standard deviation of the two samples, the significance value was p = 0.001. Therefore, it is possible to confirm that the COST is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the financial toxicity of cancer patients in Brazil. Cancer Intelligence 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7864683/ /pubmed/33574903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
de Alcantara Nogueira, Luciana
Koller, Francisco José
Marcondes, Larissa
de Fátima Mantovani, Maria
Marcon, Sonia Silva
Guimarães, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski
Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title_full Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title_fullStr Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title_short Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture
title_sort validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for brazilian culture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1158
work_keys_str_mv AT dealcantaranogueiraluciana validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT kollerfranciscojose validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT marcondeslarissa validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT defatimamantovanimaria validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT marconsoniasilva validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT guimaraespauloricardobittencourt validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture
AT kalinkelucianapuchalski validationofthecomprehensivescoreforfinancialtoxicityforbrazilianculture