Cargando…
Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups iden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0 |
_version_ | 1783647723268866048 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Brian Dombeck, Carrie Smalley, Jaye Bea Levitan, Bennett Leventhal, David Patrick-Lake, Bray Brennan, Linda McKenna, Kevin Hallinan, Zachary Corneli, Amy |
author_facet | Perry, Brian Dombeck, Carrie Smalley, Jaye Bea Levitan, Bennett Leventhal, David Patrick-Lake, Bray Brennan, Linda McKenna, Kevin Hallinan, Zachary Corneli, Amy |
author_sort | Perry, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups identify mutually beneficial engagement activities. METHODS: We conducted 28 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with representatives from research sponsor organizations (n = 14) and patient groups (n = 14) to determine: (1) how representatives define benefits and investments of patient group engagement in medical product development, and (2) to refine a list of 31 predefined patient group engagement activities. RESULTS: Patient group and sponsor representatives described similar benefits: engagement activities can enhance the quality and efficiency of clinical trials by improving patient recruitment and retention, reduce costs, and help trials meet expectations of regulators and payers. All representatives indicated that investments include both dedicated staff time and expertise, and financial resources. Factors to consider when evaluating benefits and investments were also identified as were suggestions for clarifying the list of engagement activities. DISCUSSION: Using these findings, we refined the 31 engagement activities to 24 unique activities across the medical product development lifecycle. We also developed a web-based prioritization tool (https://prioritizationtool.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/) to help clinical research sponsors and patient groups identify high-priority engagement activities. Use of this tool can help sponsors and patient groups identify the engagement activities that they believe will provide the most benefit for the least investment and may lead to more meaningful and mutually beneficial partnerships in medical product development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7864807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78648072021-02-16 Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development Perry, Brian Dombeck, Carrie Smalley, Jaye Bea Levitan, Bennett Leventhal, David Patrick-Lake, Bray Brennan, Linda McKenna, Kevin Hallinan, Zachary Corneli, Amy Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups identify mutually beneficial engagement activities. METHODS: We conducted 28 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with representatives from research sponsor organizations (n = 14) and patient groups (n = 14) to determine: (1) how representatives define benefits and investments of patient group engagement in medical product development, and (2) to refine a list of 31 predefined patient group engagement activities. RESULTS: Patient group and sponsor representatives described similar benefits: engagement activities can enhance the quality and efficiency of clinical trials by improving patient recruitment and retention, reduce costs, and help trials meet expectations of regulators and payers. All representatives indicated that investments include both dedicated staff time and expertise, and financial resources. Factors to consider when evaluating benefits and investments were also identified as were suggestions for clarifying the list of engagement activities. DISCUSSION: Using these findings, we refined the 31 engagement activities to 24 unique activities across the medical product development lifecycle. We also developed a web-based prioritization tool (https://prioritizationtool.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/) to help clinical research sponsors and patient groups identify high-priority engagement activities. Use of this tool can help sponsors and patient groups identify the engagement activities that they believe will provide the most benefit for the least investment and may lead to more meaningful and mutually beneficial partnerships in medical product development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7864807/ /pubmed/32996107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Perry, Brian Dombeck, Carrie Smalley, Jaye Bea Levitan, Bennett Leventhal, David Patrick-Lake, Bray Brennan, Linda McKenna, Kevin Hallinan, Zachary Corneli, Amy Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title | Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title_full | Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title_fullStr | Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title_short | Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development |
title_sort | development and application of a patient group engagement prioritization tool for use in medical product development |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perrybrian developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT dombeckcarrie developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT smalleyjayebea developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT levitanbennett developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT leventhaldavid developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT patricklakebray developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT brennanlinda developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT mckennakevin developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT hallinanzachary developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment AT corneliamy developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment |