Cargando…

Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development

INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Brian, Dombeck, Carrie, Smalley, Jaye Bea, Levitan, Bennett, Leventhal, David, Patrick-Lake, Bray, Brennan, Linda, McKenna, Kevin, Hallinan, Zachary, Corneli, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0
_version_ 1783647723268866048
author Perry, Brian
Dombeck, Carrie
Smalley, Jaye Bea
Levitan, Bennett
Leventhal, David
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Brennan, Linda
McKenna, Kevin
Hallinan, Zachary
Corneli, Amy
author_facet Perry, Brian
Dombeck, Carrie
Smalley, Jaye Bea
Levitan, Bennett
Leventhal, David
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Brennan, Linda
McKenna, Kevin
Hallinan, Zachary
Corneli, Amy
author_sort Perry, Brian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups identify mutually beneficial engagement activities. METHODS: We conducted 28 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with representatives from research sponsor organizations (n = 14) and patient groups (n = 14) to determine: (1) how representatives define benefits and investments of patient group engagement in medical product development, and (2) to refine a list of 31 predefined patient group engagement activities. RESULTS: Patient group and sponsor representatives described similar benefits: engagement activities can enhance the quality and efficiency of clinical trials by improving patient recruitment and retention, reduce costs, and help trials meet expectations of regulators and payers. All representatives indicated that investments include both dedicated staff time and expertise, and financial resources. Factors to consider when evaluating benefits and investments were also identified as were suggestions for clarifying the list of engagement activities. DISCUSSION: Using these findings, we refined the 31 engagement activities to 24 unique activities across the medical product development lifecycle. We also developed a web-based prioritization tool (https://prioritizationtool.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/) to help clinical research sponsors and patient groups identify high-priority engagement activities. Use of this tool can help sponsors and patient groups identify the engagement activities that they believe will provide the most benefit for the least investment and may lead to more meaningful and mutually beneficial partnerships in medical product development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7864807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78648072021-02-16 Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development Perry, Brian Dombeck, Carrie Smalley, Jaye Bea Levitan, Bennett Leventhal, David Patrick-Lake, Bray Brennan, Linda McKenna, Kevin Hallinan, Zachary Corneli, Amy Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patient group engagement is increasingly used to inform the design, conduct, and dissemination of clinical trials and other medical research activities. However, the priorities of industry sponsors and patient groups differ, and there is currently no framework to help these groups identify mutually beneficial engagement activities. METHODS: We conducted 28 qualitative, semi-structured interviews with representatives from research sponsor organizations (n = 14) and patient groups (n = 14) to determine: (1) how representatives define benefits and investments of patient group engagement in medical product development, and (2) to refine a list of 31 predefined patient group engagement activities. RESULTS: Patient group and sponsor representatives described similar benefits: engagement activities can enhance the quality and efficiency of clinical trials by improving patient recruitment and retention, reduce costs, and help trials meet expectations of regulators and payers. All representatives indicated that investments include both dedicated staff time and expertise, and financial resources. Factors to consider when evaluating benefits and investments were also identified as were suggestions for clarifying the list of engagement activities. DISCUSSION: Using these findings, we refined the 31 engagement activities to 24 unique activities across the medical product development lifecycle. We also developed a web-based prioritization tool (https://prioritizationtool.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/) to help clinical research sponsors and patient groups identify high-priority engagement activities. Use of this tool can help sponsors and patient groups identify the engagement activities that they believe will provide the most benefit for the least investment and may lead to more meaningful and mutually beneficial partnerships in medical product development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7864807/ /pubmed/32996107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Perry, Brian
Dombeck, Carrie
Smalley, Jaye Bea
Levitan, Bennett
Leventhal, David
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Brennan, Linda
McKenna, Kevin
Hallinan, Zachary
Corneli, Amy
Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title_full Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title_fullStr Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title_full_unstemmed Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title_short Development and Application of a Patient Group Engagement Prioritization Tool for Use in Medical Product Development
title_sort development and application of a patient group engagement prioritization tool for use in medical product development
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00217-0
work_keys_str_mv AT perrybrian developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT dombeckcarrie developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT smalleyjayebea developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT levitanbennett developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT leventhaldavid developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT patricklakebray developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT brennanlinda developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT mckennakevin developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT hallinanzachary developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment
AT corneliamy developmentandapplicationofapatientgroupengagementprioritizationtoolforuseinmedicalproductdevelopment