Cargando…
Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189 |
_version_ | 1783647889450336256 |
---|---|
author | Bhardwaj, Megha Terzer, Tobias Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann |
author_facet | Bhardwaj, Megha Terzer, Tobias Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann |
author_sort | Bhardwaj, Megha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong’s test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong’s p-values indicating no differences in AUCs for biomarkers like insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and serum paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3). Comparing six proteins measured with PEA and QMA showed good correlation and similar diagnostic performance for only one protein, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). The comparison of 35 proteins measured with IpA and PEA and 14 proteins analyzed with IpA and LC/MRM-MS revealed poor concordance and comparatively better AUCs when measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS. The comparison of different proteomic technologies suggests the superior performance of novel technologies like PEA and LC/MRM-MS over the assessed array-based technologies in blood-protein-based early detection of CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7865621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78656212021-02-07 Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer Bhardwaj, Megha Terzer, Tobias Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann Int J Mol Sci Article Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong’s test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong’s p-values indicating no differences in AUCs for biomarkers like insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and serum paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3). Comparing six proteins measured with PEA and QMA showed good correlation and similar diagnostic performance for only one protein, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). The comparison of 35 proteins measured with IpA and PEA and 14 proteins analyzed with IpA and LC/MRM-MS revealed poor concordance and comparatively better AUCs when measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS. The comparison of different proteomic technologies suggests the superior performance of novel technologies like PEA and LC/MRM-MS over the assessed array-based technologies in blood-protein-based early detection of CRC. MDPI 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7865621/ /pubmed/33530402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bhardwaj, Megha Terzer, Tobias Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title | Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of proteomic technologies for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhardwajmegha comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer AT terzertobias comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer AT schrotzkingpetra comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer AT brennerhermann comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer |