Cargando…

Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhardwaj, Megha, Terzer, Tobias, Schrotz-King, Petra, Brenner, Hermann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189
_version_ 1783647889450336256
author Bhardwaj, Megha
Terzer, Tobias
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
author_facet Bhardwaj, Megha
Terzer, Tobias
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
author_sort Bhardwaj, Megha
collection PubMed
description Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong’s test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong’s p-values indicating no differences in AUCs for biomarkers like insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and serum paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3). Comparing six proteins measured with PEA and QMA showed good correlation and similar diagnostic performance for only one protein, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). The comparison of 35 proteins measured with IpA and PEA and 14 proteins analyzed with IpA and LC/MRM-MS revealed poor concordance and comparatively better AUCs when measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS. The comparison of different proteomic technologies suggests the superior performance of novel technologies like PEA and LC/MRM-MS over the assessed array-based technologies in blood-protein-based early detection of CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7865621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78656212021-02-07 Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer Bhardwaj, Megha Terzer, Tobias Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann Int J Mol Sci Article Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong’s test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong’s p-values indicating no differences in AUCs for biomarkers like insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and serum paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3). Comparing six proteins measured with PEA and QMA showed good correlation and similar diagnostic performance for only one protein, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). The comparison of 35 proteins measured with IpA and PEA and 14 proteins analyzed with IpA and LC/MRM-MS revealed poor concordance and comparatively better AUCs when measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS. The comparison of different proteomic technologies suggests the superior performance of novel technologies like PEA and LC/MRM-MS over the assessed array-based technologies in blood-protein-based early detection of CRC. MDPI 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7865621/ /pubmed/33530402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bhardwaj, Megha
Terzer, Tobias
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title_full Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title_short Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer
title_sort comparison of proteomic technologies for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031189
work_keys_str_mv AT bhardwajmegha comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer
AT terzertobias comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer
AT schrotzkingpetra comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer
AT brennerhermann comparisonofproteomictechnologiesforbloodbaseddetectionofcolorectalcancer