Cargando…

Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines

The subject matter of the article concerns velocities/flow rate measurements in the area of disturbed flows-behind the 90° bend. They were conducted by means of an ultrasonic flowmeter with clamp-on sensors on pipeline, for water and two different Reynolds numbers of 70,000 and 100,000, correspondin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Synowiec, Piotr, Andruszkiewicz, Artur, Wędrychowicz, Wiesław, Piechota, Piotr, Wróblewska, Elżbieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030868
_version_ 1783647905753595904
author Synowiec, Piotr
Andruszkiewicz, Artur
Wędrychowicz, Wiesław
Piechota, Piotr
Wróblewska, Elżbieta
author_facet Synowiec, Piotr
Andruszkiewicz, Artur
Wędrychowicz, Wiesław
Piechota, Piotr
Wróblewska, Elżbieta
author_sort Synowiec, Piotr
collection PubMed
description The subject matter of the article concerns velocities/flow rate measurements in the area of disturbed flows-behind the 90° bend. They were conducted by means of an ultrasonic flowmeter with clamp-on sensors on pipeline, for water and two different Reynolds numbers of 70,000 and 100,000, corresponding to two velocities of approximately 1.42 m/s and 2.04 m/s. The tests were carried out at 12 distances from the disturbance. Sensors on the circumference of the pipeline were mounted 30° each. The correction factor values were calculated for the given measurement geometry. The measurements have shown that the values of this coefficient are always greater than 1, which means that the ultrasonic flow meter understates the speed values. They also showed that already at a distance of 8 nominal diameters from the disturbance, the correction factor does not exceed 1.02, so the measurement errors are within the maximum permissible error (MPE) of a typical ultrasonic flow meter. For distances less than eight nominal diameters from the disturbance, not taking the correction factor value into the account can lead to systematic errors of up to 10.8%. Studies have also proved that in each measurement plane behind the disturbance there are two mounting angles for the ultrasonic sensors, 60° and 240° respectively, for which the correction factor values are minimal. Additionally, using the laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) method, velocity solids were determined at individual distances from the disturbance, and the projections of velocity blocks on the appropriate plane represented velocity profiles and indicated the distances from the disturbance at which these profiles stabilise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7865690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78656902021-02-07 Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines Synowiec, Piotr Andruszkiewicz, Artur Wędrychowicz, Wiesław Piechota, Piotr Wróblewska, Elżbieta Sensors (Basel) Article The subject matter of the article concerns velocities/flow rate measurements in the area of disturbed flows-behind the 90° bend. They were conducted by means of an ultrasonic flowmeter with clamp-on sensors on pipeline, for water and two different Reynolds numbers of 70,000 and 100,000, corresponding to two velocities of approximately 1.42 m/s and 2.04 m/s. The tests were carried out at 12 distances from the disturbance. Sensors on the circumference of the pipeline were mounted 30° each. The correction factor values were calculated for the given measurement geometry. The measurements have shown that the values of this coefficient are always greater than 1, which means that the ultrasonic flow meter understates the speed values. They also showed that already at a distance of 8 nominal diameters from the disturbance, the correction factor does not exceed 1.02, so the measurement errors are within the maximum permissible error (MPE) of a typical ultrasonic flow meter. For distances less than eight nominal diameters from the disturbance, not taking the correction factor value into the account can lead to systematic errors of up to 10.8%. Studies have also proved that in each measurement plane behind the disturbance there are two mounting angles for the ultrasonic sensors, 60° and 240° respectively, for which the correction factor values are minimal. Additionally, using the laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) method, velocity solids were determined at individual distances from the disturbance, and the projections of velocity blocks on the appropriate plane represented velocity profiles and indicated the distances from the disturbance at which these profiles stabilise. MDPI 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7865690/ /pubmed/33525446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030868 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Synowiec, Piotr
Andruszkiewicz, Artur
Wędrychowicz, Wiesław
Piechota, Piotr
Wróblewska, Elżbieta
Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title_full Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title_fullStr Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title_short Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines
title_sort influence of flow disturbances behind the 90° bend on the indications of the ultrasonic flow meter with clamp-on sensors on pipelines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030868
work_keys_str_mv AT synowiecpiotr influenceofflowdisturbancesbehindthe90bendontheindicationsoftheultrasonicflowmeterwithclamponsensorsonpipelines
AT andruszkiewiczartur influenceofflowdisturbancesbehindthe90bendontheindicationsoftheultrasonicflowmeterwithclamponsensorsonpipelines
AT wedrychowiczwiesław influenceofflowdisturbancesbehindthe90bendontheindicationsoftheultrasonicflowmeterwithclamponsensorsonpipelines
AT piechotapiotr influenceofflowdisturbancesbehindthe90bendontheindicationsoftheultrasonicflowmeterwithclamponsensorsonpipelines
AT wroblewskaelzbieta influenceofflowdisturbancesbehindthe90bendontheindicationsoftheultrasonicflowmeterwithclamponsensorsonpipelines