Cargando…

Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks

In December 2016, the wastewater treatment plant of Baarle-Nassau, Netherlands, failed. The failure was caused by the illegal disposal of high volumes of acidic waste into the sewer network. Repairs cost between 80,000 and 100,000 EUR. A continuous monitoring system of a utility network such as this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chachuła, Krystian, Nowak, Robert, Solano, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030826
_version_ 1783648020753022976
author Chachuła, Krystian
Nowak, Robert
Solano, Fernando
author_facet Chachuła, Krystian
Nowak, Robert
Solano, Fernando
author_sort Chachuła, Krystian
collection PubMed
description In December 2016, the wastewater treatment plant of Baarle-Nassau, Netherlands, failed. The failure was caused by the illegal disposal of high volumes of acidic waste into the sewer network. Repairs cost between 80,000 and 100,000 EUR. A continuous monitoring system of a utility network such as this one would help to determine the causes of such pollution and could mitigate or reduce the impact of these kinds of events in the future. We have designed and tested a data fusion system that transforms the time-series of sensor measurements into an array of source-localized discharge events. The data fusion system performs this transformation as follows. First, the time-series of sensor measurements are resampled and converted to sensor observations in a unified discrete time domain. Second, sensor observations are mapped to pollutant detections that indicate the amount of specific pollutants according to a priori knowledge. Third, pollutant detections are used for inferring the propagation of the discharged pollutant downstream of the sewage network to account for missing sensor observations. Fourth, pollutant detections and inferred sensor observations are clustered to form tracks. Finally, tracks are processed and propagated upstream to form the final list of probable events. A set of experiments was performed using a modified variant of the EPANET Example Network 2. Results of our experiments show that the proposed system can narrow down the source of pollution to seven or fewer nodes, depending on the number of sensors, while processing approximately 100 sensor observations per second. Having considered the results, such a system could provide meaningful information about pollution events in utility networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7866178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78661782021-02-07 Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks Chachuła, Krystian Nowak, Robert Solano, Fernando Sensors (Basel) Article In December 2016, the wastewater treatment plant of Baarle-Nassau, Netherlands, failed. The failure was caused by the illegal disposal of high volumes of acidic waste into the sewer network. Repairs cost between 80,000 and 100,000 EUR. A continuous monitoring system of a utility network such as this one would help to determine the causes of such pollution and could mitigate or reduce the impact of these kinds of events in the future. We have designed and tested a data fusion system that transforms the time-series of sensor measurements into an array of source-localized discharge events. The data fusion system performs this transformation as follows. First, the time-series of sensor measurements are resampled and converted to sensor observations in a unified discrete time domain. Second, sensor observations are mapped to pollutant detections that indicate the amount of specific pollutants according to a priori knowledge. Third, pollutant detections are used for inferring the propagation of the discharged pollutant downstream of the sewage network to account for missing sensor observations. Fourth, pollutant detections and inferred sensor observations are clustered to form tracks. Finally, tracks are processed and propagated upstream to form the final list of probable events. A set of experiments was performed using a modified variant of the EPANET Example Network 2. Results of our experiments show that the proposed system can narrow down the source of pollution to seven or fewer nodes, depending on the number of sensors, while processing approximately 100 sensor observations per second. Having considered the results, such a system could provide meaningful information about pollution events in utility networks. MDPI 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7866178/ /pubmed/33530562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030826 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chachuła, Krystian
Nowak, Robert
Solano, Fernando
Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title_full Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title_fullStr Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title_full_unstemmed Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title_short Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks
title_sort pollution source localization in wastewater networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21030826
work_keys_str_mv AT chachułakrystian pollutionsourcelocalizationinwastewaternetworks
AT nowakrobert pollutionsourcelocalizationinwastewaternetworks
AT solanofernando pollutionsourcelocalizationinwastewaternetworks