The Value of Early Tumor Size Response to Chemotherapy in Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in childhood. At diagnosis, tumor and patient characteristics determine the prognosis and subsequent treatment stratification. There are currently no early biomarkers that identify good or poor responders to chemotherapy regimens, survival being the only valid endpoint. Early tumor size response, which is assessed by imaging, could be such a marker. We performed a systematic assessment of literature to November 2020. Six studies were included describing 2010 patients; quality assessment showed methodological limitations. We conclude that there is evidence that early progressive disease is associated with poorer survival compared to patients with non-progressive disease, being either stable disease, partial, or complete response. However, for the vast majority of patients with non-progressive disease, we found no evidence that the degree of response is prognostic for survival. Therefore, the value of early tumor size response as a prognostic marker, and its translation into treatment modifications on an individual patient or trial level should be reconsidered. ABSTRACT: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in childhood. Results of clinical trials, with three-year event-free and overall survival as primary outcomes, often take 7 to 10 years. Identification of an early surrogate biomarker, predictive for survival, is therefore crucial. We conducted a systematic review to define the prognostic value of early tumor size response in children with IRSG group III rhabdomyosarcoma. The search included MEDLINE/EMBASE from inception to 18 November 2020. In total, six studies were included, describing 2010 patients, and assessed by the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) instrument. Four studies found no prognostic value for tumor size response, whereas two studies reported a prognostic effect. In these two studies, the survival rate of patients with progressive disease was not separately analyzed from patients with stable disease, potentially explaining the difference in study outcome. In conclusion, our findings support that early progression of disease is associated with poorer survival, justifying adaptation of therapy. However, in patients with non-progressive disease, there is no evidence that the degree of response is a prognostic marker for survival. Because the vast majority of patients do not have progressive disease, early tumor size response should be reconsidered for assessment of treatment efficacy. Therefore, at present, early surrogate biomarkers for survival are still lacking.