Cargando…

Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration

BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros, de Aragão, Afonso Henrique, de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo, Lobo, Caetano Silva, Oliveti, Ana Flávia, de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli, Ramina, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7
_version_ 1783648132351918080
author da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros
de Aragão, Afonso Henrique
de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo
Lobo, Caetano Silva
Oliveti, Ana Flávia
de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli
Ramina, Ricardo
author_facet da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros
de Aragão, Afonso Henrique
de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo
Lobo, Caetano Silva
Oliveti, Ana Flávia
de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli
Ramina, Ricardo
author_sort da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. RESULTS: The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7866687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78666872021-02-08 Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros de Aragão, Afonso Henrique de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo Lobo, Caetano Silva Oliveti, Ana Flávia de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli Ramina, Ricardo 3D Print Med Technical Note BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. RESULTS: The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7866687/ /pubmed/33548008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Note
da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros
de Aragão, Afonso Henrique
de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo
Lobo, Caetano Silva
Oliveti, Ana Flávia
de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli
Ramina, Ricardo
Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_full Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_fullStr Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_full_unstemmed Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_short Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_sort cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvajuniorerasmobarros cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT dearagaoafonsohenrique cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT depaulaloureiromarcelo cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT lobocaetanosilva cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT olivetianaflavia cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT deoliveirarafaelmartinelli cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT raminaricardo cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration