Cargando…
Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7 |
_version_ | 1783648132351918080 |
---|---|
author | da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros de Aragão, Afonso Henrique de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo Lobo, Caetano Silva Oliveti, Ana Flávia de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli Ramina, Ricardo |
author_facet | da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros de Aragão, Afonso Henrique de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo Lobo, Caetano Silva Oliveti, Ana Flávia de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli Ramina, Ricardo |
author_sort | da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. RESULTS: The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7866687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78666872021-02-08 Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros de Aragão, Afonso Henrique de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo Lobo, Caetano Silva Oliveti, Ana Flávia de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli Ramina, Ricardo 3D Print Med Technical Note BACKGROUND: Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. RESULTS: The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7866687/ /pubmed/33548008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note da Silva Júnior, Erasmo Barros de Aragão, Afonso Henrique de Paula Loureiro, Marcelo Lobo, Caetano Silva Oliveti, Ana Flávia de Oliveira, Rafael Martinelli Ramina, Ricardo Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title | Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title_full | Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title_fullStr | Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title_full_unstemmed | Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title_short | Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
title_sort | cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasilvajuniorerasmobarros cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT dearagaoafonsohenrique cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT depaulaloureiromarcelo cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT lobocaetanosilva cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT olivetianaflavia cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT deoliveirarafaelmartinelli cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration AT raminaricardo cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration |