Cargando…
An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33549128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4 |
_version_ | 1783648133771689984 |
---|---|
author | Morthorst, Britt Rubæk, Lotte Lindschou, Jane Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Bjureberg, Johan Hellner, Clara Møhl, Bo Pagsberg, Anne Katrine |
author_facet | Morthorst, Britt Rubæk, Lotte Lindschou, Jane Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Bjureberg, Johan Hellner, Clara Møhl, Bo Pagsberg, Anne Katrine |
author_sort | Morthorst, Britt |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs investigation. Non-randomised studies suggest ERITA improves emotion regulations skills and reduces NSSI frequency. Before conducting a large pragmatic randomised clinical trial, we aim to investigate the feasibility of ERITA in Denmark. METHODS: A randomised, parallel group feasibility trial comparing ERITA as add on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual in 30 adolescents age 13–17 years with recurrent NSSI referred to outpatient clinics in The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. Feasibility outcomes are (1) completion of follow-up, (2) the fraction of eligible participants who consent to inclusion and randomisation and (3) compliance with the intervention. Clinical outcomes such as self-injury frequency and the ability to regulate emotions will be investigated exploratorily. DISCUSSION: Internet-based interventions are assumed to be appealing to adolescents by being easily accessible and easy to navigate by tech natives. Disclosure of self-injury behaviour may be facilitated by an online intervention. The evidence for self-injury specific treatment needs to be extended but prior to a large clinical trial, the feasibility of methods and procedures must be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04243603. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7866693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78666932021-02-08 An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial Morthorst, Britt Rubæk, Lotte Lindschou, Jane Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Bjureberg, Johan Hellner, Clara Møhl, Bo Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs investigation. Non-randomised studies suggest ERITA improves emotion regulations skills and reduces NSSI frequency. Before conducting a large pragmatic randomised clinical trial, we aim to investigate the feasibility of ERITA in Denmark. METHODS: A randomised, parallel group feasibility trial comparing ERITA as add on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual in 30 adolescents age 13–17 years with recurrent NSSI referred to outpatient clinics in The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. Feasibility outcomes are (1) completion of follow-up, (2) the fraction of eligible participants who consent to inclusion and randomisation and (3) compliance with the intervention. Clinical outcomes such as self-injury frequency and the ability to regulate emotions will be investigated exploratorily. DISCUSSION: Internet-based interventions are assumed to be appealing to adolescents by being easily accessible and easy to navigate by tech natives. Disclosure of self-injury behaviour may be facilitated by an online intervention. The evidence for self-injury specific treatment needs to be extended but prior to a large clinical trial, the feasibility of methods and procedures must be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04243603. BioMed Central 2021-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7866693/ /pubmed/33549128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Morthorst, Britt Rubæk, Lotte Lindschou, Jane Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Bjureberg, Johan Hellner, Clara Møhl, Bo Pagsberg, Anne Katrine An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title | An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title_full | An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title_fullStr | An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title_full_unstemmed | An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title_short | An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
title_sort | internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33549128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morthorstbritt aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT rubæklotte aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT lindschoujane aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT jakobsenjanuschristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT gluudchristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT bjurebergjohan aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT hellnerclara aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT møhlbo aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT pagsbergannekatrine aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT morthorstbritt internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT rubæklotte internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT lindschoujane internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT jakobsenjanuschristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT gluudchristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT bjurebergjohan internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT hellnerclara internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT møhlbo internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial AT pagsbergannekatrine internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial |