Cargando…

An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morthorst, Britt, Rubæk, Lotte, Lindschou, Jane, Jakobsen, Janus Christian, Gluud, Christian, Bjureberg, Johan, Hellner, Clara, Møhl, Bo, Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33549128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4
_version_ 1783648133771689984
author Morthorst, Britt
Rubæk, Lotte
Lindschou, Jane
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Bjureberg, Johan
Hellner, Clara
Møhl, Bo
Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
author_facet Morthorst, Britt
Rubæk, Lotte
Lindschou, Jane
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Bjureberg, Johan
Hellner, Clara
Møhl, Bo
Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
author_sort Morthorst, Britt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs investigation. Non-randomised studies suggest ERITA improves emotion regulations skills and reduces NSSI frequency. Before conducting a large pragmatic randomised clinical trial, we aim to investigate the feasibility of ERITA in Denmark. METHODS: A randomised, parallel group feasibility trial comparing ERITA as add on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual in 30 adolescents age 13–17 years with recurrent NSSI referred to outpatient clinics in The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. Feasibility outcomes are (1) completion of follow-up, (2) the fraction of eligible participants who consent to inclusion and randomisation and (3) compliance with the intervention. Clinical outcomes such as self-injury frequency and the ability to regulate emotions will be investigated exploratorily. DISCUSSION: Internet-based interventions are assumed to be appealing to adolescents by being easily accessible and easy to navigate by tech natives. Disclosure of self-injury behaviour may be facilitated by an online intervention. The evidence for self-injury specific treatment needs to be extended but prior to a large clinical trial, the feasibility of methods and procedures must be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04243603.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7866693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78666932021-02-08 An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial Morthorst, Britt Rubæk, Lotte Lindschou, Jane Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Bjureberg, Johan Hellner, Clara Møhl, Bo Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has gained increased attention in recent years due to increased prevalence, especially among adolescents. Evidence-based interventions for NSSI are sparse. Emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (ERITA) is an online intervention that needs investigation. Non-randomised studies suggest ERITA improves emotion regulations skills and reduces NSSI frequency. Before conducting a large pragmatic randomised clinical trial, we aim to investigate the feasibility of ERITA in Denmark. METHODS: A randomised, parallel group feasibility trial comparing ERITA as add on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual in 30 adolescents age 13–17 years with recurrent NSSI referred to outpatient clinics in The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. Feasibility outcomes are (1) completion of follow-up, (2) the fraction of eligible participants who consent to inclusion and randomisation and (3) compliance with the intervention. Clinical outcomes such as self-injury frequency and the ability to regulate emotions will be investigated exploratorily. DISCUSSION: Internet-based interventions are assumed to be appealing to adolescents by being easily accessible and easy to navigate by tech natives. Disclosure of self-injury behaviour may be facilitated by an online intervention. The evidence for self-injury specific treatment needs to be extended but prior to a large clinical trial, the feasibility of methods and procedures must be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04243603. BioMed Central 2021-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7866693/ /pubmed/33549128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Morthorst, Britt
Rubæk, Lotte
Lindschou, Jane
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Bjureberg, Johan
Hellner, Clara
Møhl, Bo
Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title_full An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title_fullStr An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title_short An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
title_sort internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33549128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4
work_keys_str_mv AT morthorstbritt aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT rubæklotte aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT lindschoujane aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT jakobsenjanuschristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT gluudchristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT bjurebergjohan aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT hellnerclara aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT møhlbo aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT pagsbergannekatrine aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT morthorstbritt internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT rubæklotte internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT lindschoujane internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT jakobsenjanuschristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT gluudchristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT bjurebergjohan internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT hellnerclara internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT møhlbo internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial
AT pagsbergannekatrine internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitytrial