Cargando…
Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size
BACKGROUND: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. METHOD: A phantom with detachable parts was made using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_19 |
_version_ | 1783648191550324736 |
---|---|
author | Qasempour, Younes Mohammadi, Amirsalar Rezaei, Mostafa Pouryazadanpanah, Parisa Ziaddini, Fatemeh Borbori, Alma Shiri, Isaac Hajianfar, Ghasem Janati, Azam Ghasemirad, Sareh Abdollahi, Hamid |
author_facet | Qasempour, Younes Mohammadi, Amirsalar Rezaei, Mostafa Pouryazadanpanah, Parisa Ziaddini, Fatemeh Borbori, Alma Shiri, Isaac Hajianfar, Ghasem Janati, Azam Ghasemirad, Sareh Abdollahi, Hamid |
author_sort | Qasempour, Younes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. METHOD: A phantom with detachable parts was made using wood, sponge, Plexiglas, and rubber. Each material had 1 cm thickness and was imaged for consecutive time. The phantom also was imaged by change in the arrangement of its materials. Imaging was done with two focal spot sizes including 0.6 and 1.2 mm. All images were acquired with a digital radiography machine. Several texture features were extracted from the same size region of interest in all images. To assess reproducibility, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland–Altman tests were used. RESULTS: Results show that 59%, 50%, and 4.5% of all features are most reproducible (COV ≤5%) against change in focal spot size, material arrangements, and phantom's materials, respectively. Results on Bland–Altman analysis showed that there is just a nonreproducible feature against change in the focal spot size. On the ICC results, we observed that the ICCs for more features are >0.90 and there were few features with ICC lower than 0.90. CONCLUSION: We showed that radiomic textures are vulnerable against changes in materials, arrangement, and different focal spot sizes. These results suggest that a careful analysis of the effects of these parameters is essential before any radiomic clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7866945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78669452021-02-10 Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size Qasempour, Younes Mohammadi, Amirsalar Rezaei, Mostafa Pouryazadanpanah, Parisa Ziaddini, Fatemeh Borbori, Alma Shiri, Isaac Hajianfar, Ghasem Janati, Azam Ghasemirad, Sareh Abdollahi, Hamid J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. METHOD: A phantom with detachable parts was made using wood, sponge, Plexiglas, and rubber. Each material had 1 cm thickness and was imaged for consecutive time. The phantom also was imaged by change in the arrangement of its materials. Imaging was done with two focal spot sizes including 0.6 and 1.2 mm. All images were acquired with a digital radiography machine. Several texture features were extracted from the same size region of interest in all images. To assess reproducibility, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland–Altman tests were used. RESULTS: Results show that 59%, 50%, and 4.5% of all features are most reproducible (COV ≤5%) against change in focal spot size, material arrangements, and phantom's materials, respectively. Results on Bland–Altman analysis showed that there is just a nonreproducible feature against change in the focal spot size. On the ICC results, we observed that the ICCs for more features are >0.90 and there were few features with ICC lower than 0.90. CONCLUSION: We showed that radiomic textures are vulnerable against changes in materials, arrangement, and different focal spot sizes. These results suggest that a careful analysis of the effects of these parameters is essential before any radiomic clinical application. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7866945/ /pubmed/33575200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Qasempour, Younes Mohammadi, Amirsalar Rezaei, Mostafa Pouryazadanpanah, Parisa Ziaddini, Fatemeh Borbori, Alma Shiri, Isaac Hajianfar, Ghasem Janati, Azam Ghasemirad, Sareh Abdollahi, Hamid Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title | Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title_full | Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title_fullStr | Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title_short | Radiographic Texture Reproducibility: The Impact of Different Materials, their Arrangement, and Focal Spot Size |
title_sort | radiographic texture reproducibility: the impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qasempouryounes radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT mohammadiamirsalar radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT rezaeimostafa radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT pouryazadanpanahparisa radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT ziaddinifatemeh radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT borborialma radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT shiriisaac radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT hajianfarghasem radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT janatiazam radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT ghasemiradsareh radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize AT abdollahihamid radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize |