Cargando…
Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration
Dentinal tubule penetration influences root canal treatment sealing. The aim of this study was to compare dentinal penetration of two clinical presentations of silicate-based sealers using confocal laser. Sixty single-rooted human teeth from 50–70 year-old patients extracted for orthodontic/periodon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14030659 |
_version_ | 1783648209664475136 |
---|---|
author | Muedra, Paula Forner, Leopoldo Lozano, Adrián Sanz, José L. Rodríguez-Lozano, Francisco J. Guerrero-Gironés, Julia Riccitiello, Francesco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Llena, Carmen |
author_facet | Muedra, Paula Forner, Leopoldo Lozano, Adrián Sanz, José L. Rodríguez-Lozano, Francisco J. Guerrero-Gironés, Julia Riccitiello, Francesco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Llena, Carmen |
author_sort | Muedra, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dentinal tubule penetration influences root canal treatment sealing. The aim of this study was to compare dentinal penetration of two clinical presentations of silicate-based sealers using confocal laser. Sixty single-rooted human teeth from 50–70 year-old patients extracted for orthodontic/periodontal reasons were used. Canals were prepared using Mtwo system up to 35/0.04, with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and final irrigation using 17% EDTA. Teeth were randomly assigned into study groups (n(i) = 20): EndoSequence BC sealer (ES, group 1), BioRoot RCS (BR, group 2); and a control group (n(c) = 20) with AH Plus (AHP). Root canals were obturated with 35/0.04 gutta-percha (single-cone technique). The samples were obtained from apical, middle, and coronal thirds. Dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon t-test (95% confidence interval). ES exhibited a significantly higher penetration than AHP in apical and middle thirds (p < 0.05), and in middle and coronal thirds relative to BR (p < 0.05). The percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter was significantly higher for ES compared to BR in all thirds, but only in the apical third for AHP (p < 0.05). The pre-mixed silicate-based sealer exhibited better penetration than the powder/liquid one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7867024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78670242021-02-07 Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration Muedra, Paula Forner, Leopoldo Lozano, Adrián Sanz, José L. Rodríguez-Lozano, Francisco J. Guerrero-Gironés, Julia Riccitiello, Francesco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Llena, Carmen Materials (Basel) Article Dentinal tubule penetration influences root canal treatment sealing. The aim of this study was to compare dentinal penetration of two clinical presentations of silicate-based sealers using confocal laser. Sixty single-rooted human teeth from 50–70 year-old patients extracted for orthodontic/periodontal reasons were used. Canals were prepared using Mtwo system up to 35/0.04, with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and final irrigation using 17% EDTA. Teeth were randomly assigned into study groups (n(i) = 20): EndoSequence BC sealer (ES, group 1), BioRoot RCS (BR, group 2); and a control group (n(c) = 20) with AH Plus (AHP). Root canals were obturated with 35/0.04 gutta-percha (single-cone technique). The samples were obtained from apical, middle, and coronal thirds. Dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon t-test (95% confidence interval). ES exhibited a significantly higher penetration than AHP in apical and middle thirds (p < 0.05), and in middle and coronal thirds relative to BR (p < 0.05). The percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter was significantly higher for ES compared to BR in all thirds, but only in the apical third for AHP (p < 0.05). The pre-mixed silicate-based sealer exhibited better penetration than the powder/liquid one. MDPI 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7867024/ /pubmed/33572611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14030659 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Muedra, Paula Forner, Leopoldo Lozano, Adrián Sanz, José L. Rodríguez-Lozano, Francisco J. Guerrero-Gironés, Julia Riccitiello, Francesco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Llena, Carmen Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title | Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title_full | Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title_fullStr | Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title_full_unstemmed | Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title_short | Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration |
title_sort | could the calcium silicate-based sealer presentation form influence dentinal sealing? an in vitro confocal laser study on tubular penetration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14030659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muedrapaula couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT fornerleopoldo couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT lozanoadrian couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT sanzjosel couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT rodriguezlozanofranciscoj couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT guerrerogironesjulia couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT riccitiellofrancesco couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT spagnuologianrico couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration AT llenacarmen couldthecalciumsilicatebasedsealerpresentationforminfluencedentinalsealinganinvitroconfocallaserstudyontubularpenetration |