Cargando…

High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters

Purpose: To examine the contribution of anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. Methods: Measurements taken with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vega, Yakov, Gershoni, Assaf, Achiron, Asaf, Tuuminen, Raimo, Weinberger, Yehonatan, Livny, Eitan, Nahum, Yoav, Bahar, Irit, Elbaz, Uri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10030542
_version_ 1783648270472445952
author Vega, Yakov
Gershoni, Assaf
Achiron, Asaf
Tuuminen, Raimo
Weinberger, Yehonatan
Livny, Eitan
Nahum, Yoav
Bahar, Irit
Elbaz, Uri
author_facet Vega, Yakov
Gershoni, Assaf
Achiron, Asaf
Tuuminen, Raimo
Weinberger, Yehonatan
Livny, Eitan
Nahum, Yoav
Bahar, Irit
Elbaz, Uri
author_sort Vega, Yakov
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To examine the contribution of anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. Methods: Measurements taken with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) swept-source biometry of 501 right eyes of 501 consecutive patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed. IOL power was calculated using the BUII formula, first through the inclusion of all measured variables and then by using partial biometry data. For each calculation method, the IOL power targeting emmetropia was recorded and compared for the whole cohort and stratified by axial length (AL) of the measured eye. Results: The mean IOL power calculated for the entire cohort using all available parameters was 19.50 ± 5.11 diopters (D). When comparing it to the results obtained by partial biometry data, the mean absolute difference ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 D; p < 0.001. The optional variables (ACD, LT, WTW) had the least effect in long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm; mean absolute difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.07 D; p < 0.001), while the greatest effect in short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm; mean absolute difference from 0.10 to 0.21 D; p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with a mean absolute IOL dioptric power difference more than 0.25 D was the highest (32.0%) among the short AL group when using AL and keratometry values only. Conclusions: Using partial biometry data, the BUII formula in small eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm) resulted in a clinically significant difference in the calculated IOL power compared to the full biometry data. In contrast, the contribution of the optional parameters to the calculated IOL power was of little clinical importance in eyes with AL longer than 22 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78672972021-02-07 High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters Vega, Yakov Gershoni, Assaf Achiron, Asaf Tuuminen, Raimo Weinberger, Yehonatan Livny, Eitan Nahum, Yoav Bahar, Irit Elbaz, Uri J Clin Med Article Purpose: To examine the contribution of anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. Methods: Measurements taken with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) swept-source biometry of 501 right eyes of 501 consecutive patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed. IOL power was calculated using the BUII formula, first through the inclusion of all measured variables and then by using partial biometry data. For each calculation method, the IOL power targeting emmetropia was recorded and compared for the whole cohort and stratified by axial length (AL) of the measured eye. Results: The mean IOL power calculated for the entire cohort using all available parameters was 19.50 ± 5.11 diopters (D). When comparing it to the results obtained by partial biometry data, the mean absolute difference ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 D; p < 0.001. The optional variables (ACD, LT, WTW) had the least effect in long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm; mean absolute difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.07 D; p < 0.001), while the greatest effect in short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm; mean absolute difference from 0.10 to 0.21 D; p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with a mean absolute IOL dioptric power difference more than 0.25 D was the highest (32.0%) among the short AL group when using AL and keratometry values only. Conclusions: Using partial biometry data, the BUII formula in small eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm) resulted in a clinically significant difference in the calculated IOL power compared to the full biometry data. In contrast, the contribution of the optional parameters to the calculated IOL power was of little clinical importance in eyes with AL longer than 22 mm. MDPI 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7867297/ /pubmed/33540639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10030542 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vega, Yakov
Gershoni, Assaf
Achiron, Asaf
Tuuminen, Raimo
Weinberger, Yehonatan
Livny, Eitan
Nahum, Yoav
Bahar, Irit
Elbaz, Uri
High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title_full High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title_fullStr High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title_full_unstemmed High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title_short High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters
title_sort high agreement between barrett universal ii calculations with and without utilization of optional biometry parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10030542
work_keys_str_mv AT vegayakov highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT gershoniassaf highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT achironasaf highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT tuuminenraimo highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT weinbergeryehonatan highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT livnyeitan highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT nahumyoav highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT baharirit highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters
AT elbazuri highagreementbetweenbarrettuniversaliicalculationswithandwithoututilizationofoptionalbiometryparameters