Cargando…

Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience

Peritonitis is a major peritoneal dialysis complication. Despite a high cure rate, relapsing and repeat peritonitis is associated with Tenckhoff catheter biofilm and multiple episodes of peritoneal damage. In relapsing peritonitis, prompt catheter removal is mandatory; otherwise, in repeat peritonit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reis, Marina, Ribeiro, Catarina, Gomes, Ana Marta, Santos, Clara, Lopes, Daniela, Fernandes, João Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6662488
_version_ 1783648301551190016
author Reis, Marina
Ribeiro, Catarina
Gomes, Ana Marta
Santos, Clara
Lopes, Daniela
Fernandes, João Carlos
author_facet Reis, Marina
Ribeiro, Catarina
Gomes, Ana Marta
Santos, Clara
Lopes, Daniela
Fernandes, João Carlos
author_sort Reis, Marina
collection PubMed
description Peritonitis is a major peritoneal dialysis complication. Despite a high cure rate, relapsing and repeat peritonitis is associated with Tenckhoff catheter biofilm and multiple episodes of peritoneal damage. In relapsing peritonitis, prompt catheter removal is mandatory; otherwise, in repeat peritonitis, there is not a clear indication for catheter removal. It is questionable if the approach to removal should be different. There are few recent data on repeat and relapsing peritonitis microbiology and clinical outcomes since most studies are from the past decade. This study evaluates the microbiology, clinical outcomes, and impact of relapsing and repeat peritonitis on technique survival and the impact of catheter removal in development of further peritonitis episodes by the same microorganism. We developed a single-center retrospective study from 1998 to 2019 that compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis with a control group in terms of causative microorganisms, cure rate, catheter removal, and permanent and temporary transfer to hemodialysis. We also compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis clinical outcomes when Tenckhoff catheter was not removed. Comparing to the control group, the repeat/relapsing group had a higher cure rate (80.4% versus 74.5%, p=0.01) and lower rate of hospitalization (10.9% versus 27.7%, p=0.01). Technique survival was superior in the repeat/relapsing group (log rank = 4.5, p=0.03). Gram-positive peritonitis was more common in the repeat/relapsing group especially Streptococci viridans (43.5% versus 21.3%, p=0.01) and Gram-negatives in the control group (26.6% vs 9.0%, p=0.02). When the Tenckhoff catheter was not removed after a repeat episode, 58.6% developed a new repeat/relapsing episode versus 60.0% in the relapsing group. Although repeat and relapsing peritonitis have a higher cure rate, it leads to further episodes of peritonitis and consequent morbidity. When Tenckhoff catheter was not removed, the probability of another peritonitis episode by the same microorganism is similar in repeat and relapsing peritonitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78674582021-02-08 Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience Reis, Marina Ribeiro, Catarina Gomes, Ana Marta Santos, Clara Lopes, Daniela Fernandes, João Carlos Int J Nephrol Research Article Peritonitis is a major peritoneal dialysis complication. Despite a high cure rate, relapsing and repeat peritonitis is associated with Tenckhoff catheter biofilm and multiple episodes of peritoneal damage. In relapsing peritonitis, prompt catheter removal is mandatory; otherwise, in repeat peritonitis, there is not a clear indication for catheter removal. It is questionable if the approach to removal should be different. There are few recent data on repeat and relapsing peritonitis microbiology and clinical outcomes since most studies are from the past decade. This study evaluates the microbiology, clinical outcomes, and impact of relapsing and repeat peritonitis on technique survival and the impact of catheter removal in development of further peritonitis episodes by the same microorganism. We developed a single-center retrospective study from 1998 to 2019 that compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis with a control group in terms of causative microorganisms, cure rate, catheter removal, and permanent and temporary transfer to hemodialysis. We also compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis clinical outcomes when Tenckhoff catheter was not removed. Comparing to the control group, the repeat/relapsing group had a higher cure rate (80.4% versus 74.5%, p=0.01) and lower rate of hospitalization (10.9% versus 27.7%, p=0.01). Technique survival was superior in the repeat/relapsing group (log rank = 4.5, p=0.03). Gram-positive peritonitis was more common in the repeat/relapsing group especially Streptococci viridans (43.5% versus 21.3%, p=0.01) and Gram-negatives in the control group (26.6% vs 9.0%, p=0.02). When the Tenckhoff catheter was not removed after a repeat episode, 58.6% developed a new repeat/relapsing episode versus 60.0% in the relapsing group. Although repeat and relapsing peritonitis have a higher cure rate, it leads to further episodes of peritonitis and consequent morbidity. When Tenckhoff catheter was not removed, the probability of another peritonitis episode by the same microorganism is similar in repeat and relapsing peritonitis. Hindawi 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7867458/ /pubmed/33564478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6662488 Text en Copyright © 2021 Marina Reis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reis, Marina
Ribeiro, Catarina
Gomes, Ana Marta
Santos, Clara
Lopes, Daniela
Fernandes, João Carlos
Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title_full Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title_short Repeat and Relapsing Peritonitis Microbiological Trends and Outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center Experience
title_sort repeat and relapsing peritonitis microbiological trends and outcomes: a 21-year single-center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6662488
work_keys_str_mv AT reismarina repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience
AT ribeirocatarina repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience
AT gomesanamarta repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience
AT santosclara repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience
AT lopesdaniela repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience
AT fernandesjoaocarlos repeatandrelapsingperitonitismicrobiologicaltrendsandoutcomesa21yearsinglecenterexperience