Cargando…
Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme
PURPOSE: The pharmacology and clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education during the undergraduate medical curriculum of NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal, was changed from a traditional programme (i.e. discipline-based, lectures) to a problem-based learning (PBL) programme (i.e. inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3 |
_version_ | 1783648308738129920 |
---|---|
author | Brinkman, David J. Monteiro, Teresa Monteiro, Emilia C. Richir, Milan C. van Agtmael, Michiel A. Tichelaar, Jelle |
author_facet | Brinkman, David J. Monteiro, Teresa Monteiro, Emilia C. Richir, Milan C. van Agtmael, Michiel A. Tichelaar, Jelle |
author_sort | Brinkman, David J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The pharmacology and clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education during the undergraduate medical curriculum of NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal, was changed from a traditional programme (i.e. discipline-based, lectures) to a problem-based learning (PBL) programme (i.e. integrated, case-based discussions) without an increase in teaching hours. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this change improved the prescribing competencies of final-year medical students. METHODS: Final-year students from both programmes (2015 and 2019) were invited to complete a validated prescribing assessment and questionnaire. The assessment comprised 24 multiple-choice questions in three subdomains (working mechanism, side-effects and interactions/contraindications), and five clinical case scenarios of common diseases. The questionnaire focused on self-reported prescribing confidence, preparedness for future prescribing task and education received. RESULTS: In total, 36 (22%) final-year medical students from the traditional programme and 54 (23%) from the PBL programme participated. Overall, students in the PBL programme had significantly higher knowledge scores than students in the traditional programme (76% (SD 9) vs 67% (SD 15); p = 0.002). Additionally, students in the PBL programme made significantly fewer inappropriate therapy choices (p = 0.023) and fewer erroneous prescriptions than did students in the traditional programme (p = 0.27). Students in the PBL programme felt more confident in prescribing, felt better prepared for prescribing as junior doctor and completed more drug prescriptions during their medical training. CONCLUSION: Changing from a traditional programme to an integrated PBL programme in pharmacology and CPT during the undergraduate medical curriculum may improve the prescribing competencies of final-year students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7867513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78675132021-02-16 Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme Brinkman, David J. Monteiro, Teresa Monteiro, Emilia C. Richir, Milan C. van Agtmael, Michiel A. Tichelaar, Jelle Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: The pharmacology and clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education during the undergraduate medical curriculum of NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal, was changed from a traditional programme (i.e. discipline-based, lectures) to a problem-based learning (PBL) programme (i.e. integrated, case-based discussions) without an increase in teaching hours. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this change improved the prescribing competencies of final-year medical students. METHODS: Final-year students from both programmes (2015 and 2019) were invited to complete a validated prescribing assessment and questionnaire. The assessment comprised 24 multiple-choice questions in three subdomains (working mechanism, side-effects and interactions/contraindications), and five clinical case scenarios of common diseases. The questionnaire focused on self-reported prescribing confidence, preparedness for future prescribing task and education received. RESULTS: In total, 36 (22%) final-year medical students from the traditional programme and 54 (23%) from the PBL programme participated. Overall, students in the PBL programme had significantly higher knowledge scores than students in the traditional programme (76% (SD 9) vs 67% (SD 15); p = 0.002). Additionally, students in the PBL programme made significantly fewer inappropriate therapy choices (p = 0.023) and fewer erroneous prescriptions than did students in the traditional programme (p = 0.27). Students in the PBL programme felt more confident in prescribing, felt better prepared for prescribing as junior doctor and completed more drug prescriptions during their medical training. CONCLUSION: Changing from a traditional programme to an integrated PBL programme in pharmacology and CPT during the undergraduate medical curriculum may improve the prescribing competencies of final-year students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7867513/ /pubmed/33098019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Brinkman, David J. Monteiro, Teresa Monteiro, Emilia C. Richir, Milan C. van Agtmael, Michiel A. Tichelaar, Jelle Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title | Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title_full | Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title_fullStr | Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title_short | Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
title_sort | switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinkmandavidj switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme AT monteiroteresa switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme AT monteiroemiliac switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme AT richirmilanc switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme AT vanagtmaelmichiela switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme AT tichelaarjelle switchingfromatraditionalundergraduateprogrammeinclinicalpharmacologyandtherapeuticstoaproblembasedlearningprogramme |