Cargando…

Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: New treatments and interventions are in development to address clinical needs in heart failure. To support decision making on reimbursement, cost-effectiveness analyses are frequently required. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize heart fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Tanna, Gian Luca, Urbich, Michael, Wirtz, Heidi S., Potrata, Barbara, Heisen, Marieke, Bennison, Craig, Brazier, John, Globe, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6
_version_ 1783648310355034112
author Di Tanna, Gian Luca
Urbich, Michael
Wirtz, Heidi S.
Potrata, Barbara
Heisen, Marieke
Bennison, Craig
Brazier, John
Globe, Gary
author_facet Di Tanna, Gian Luca
Urbich, Michael
Wirtz, Heidi S.
Potrata, Barbara
Heisen, Marieke
Bennison, Craig
Brazier, John
Globe, Gary
author_sort Di Tanna, Gian Luca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: New treatments and interventions are in development to address clinical needs in heart failure. To support decision making on reimbursement, cost-effectiveness analyses are frequently required. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize heart failure utility values for use in economic evaluations. METHODS: Databases were searched for articles published until June 2019 that reported health utility values for patients with heart failure. Publications were reviewed with specific attention to study design; reported values were categorized according to the health states, ‘chronic heart failure’, ‘hospitalized’, and ‘other acute heart failure’. Interquartile limits (25th percentile ‘Q1’, 75th percentile ‘Q3’) were calculated for health states and heart failure subgroups where there were sufficient data. RESULTS: The systematic literature review identified 161 publications based on data from 142 studies. Utility values for chronic heart failure were reported by 128 publications; 39 publications published values for hospitalized and three for other acute heart failure. There was substantial heterogeneity in the specifics of the study populations, methods of elicitation, and summary statistics, which is reflected in the wide range of utility values reported. EQ-5D was the most used instrument; the interquartile limit for mean EQ-5D values for chronic heart failure was 0.64–0.72. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wealth of published utility values for heart failure to support economic evaluations. Data are heterogenous owing to specificities of the study population and methodology of utility value elicitation and analysis. Choice of value(s) to support economic models must be carefully justified to ensure a robust economic analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78675202021-02-16 Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review Di Tanna, Gian Luca Urbich, Michael Wirtz, Heidi S. Potrata, Barbara Heisen, Marieke Bennison, Craig Brazier, John Globe, Gary Pharmacoeconomics Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: New treatments and interventions are in development to address clinical needs in heart failure. To support decision making on reimbursement, cost-effectiveness analyses are frequently required. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize heart failure utility values for use in economic evaluations. METHODS: Databases were searched for articles published until June 2019 that reported health utility values for patients with heart failure. Publications were reviewed with specific attention to study design; reported values were categorized according to the health states, ‘chronic heart failure’, ‘hospitalized’, and ‘other acute heart failure’. Interquartile limits (25th percentile ‘Q1’, 75th percentile ‘Q3’) were calculated for health states and heart failure subgroups where there were sufficient data. RESULTS: The systematic literature review identified 161 publications based on data from 142 studies. Utility values for chronic heart failure were reported by 128 publications; 39 publications published values for hospitalized and three for other acute heart failure. There was substantial heterogeneity in the specifics of the study populations, methods of elicitation, and summary statistics, which is reflected in the wide range of utility values reported. EQ-5D was the most used instrument; the interquartile limit for mean EQ-5D values for chronic heart failure was 0.64–0.72. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wealth of published utility values for heart failure to support economic evaluations. Data are heterogenous owing to specificities of the study population and methodology of utility value elicitation and analysis. Choice of value(s) to support economic models must be carefully justified to ensure a robust economic analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7867520/ /pubmed/33251572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Di Tanna, Gian Luca
Urbich, Michael
Wirtz, Heidi S.
Potrata, Barbara
Heisen, Marieke
Bennison, Craig
Brazier, John
Globe, Gary
Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort health state utilities of patients with heart failure: a systematic literature review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ditannagianluca healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT urbichmichael healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT wirtzheidis healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT potratabarbara healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT heisenmarieke healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT bennisoncraig healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT brazierjohn healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview
AT globegary healthstateutilitiesofpatientswithheartfailureasystematicliteraturereview