Cargando…

Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network

The objectives were to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using local features for differentiating distal ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths, compare the CNN method with a semi-quantitative method and with radiologists’ assessments and to evaluate whether the assessment o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jendeberg, Johan, Thunberg, Per, Lidén, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01180-z
_version_ 1783648319142100992
author Jendeberg, Johan
Thunberg, Per
Lidén, Mats
author_facet Jendeberg, Johan
Thunberg, Per
Lidén, Mats
author_sort Jendeberg, Johan
collection PubMed
description The objectives were to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using local features for differentiating distal ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths, compare the CNN method with a semi-quantitative method and with radiologists’ assessments and to evaluate whether the assessment of a calcification and its local surroundings is sufficient for discriminating ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths in non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT). We retrospectively included 341 consecutive patients with acute renal colic and a ureteral stone on NECT showing either a distal ureteral stone, a phlebolith or both. A 2.5-dimensional CNN (2.5D-CNN) model was used, where perpendicular axial, coronal and sagittal images through each calcification were used as input data for the CNN. The CNN was trained on 384 calcifications, and evaluated on an unseen dataset of 50 stones and 50 phleboliths. The CNN was compared to the assessment by seven radiologists who reviewed a local 5 × 5 × 5 cm image stack surrounding each calcification, and to a semi-quantitative method using cut-off values based on the attenuation and volume of the calcifications. The CNN differentiated stones and phleboliths with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 94%, 90% and 92% and an AUC of 0.95. This was similar to a majority vote accuracy of 93% and significantly higher (p = 0.03) than the mean radiologist accuracy of 86%. The semi-quantitative method accuracy was 49%. In conclusion, the CNN differentiated ureteral stones from phleboliths with higher accuracy than the mean of seven radiologists’ assessments using local features. However, more than local features are needed to reach optimal discrimination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78675602021-02-16 Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network Jendeberg, Johan Thunberg, Per Lidén, Mats Urolithiasis Original Paper The objectives were to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using local features for differentiating distal ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths, compare the CNN method with a semi-quantitative method and with radiologists’ assessments and to evaluate whether the assessment of a calcification and its local surroundings is sufficient for discriminating ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths in non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT). We retrospectively included 341 consecutive patients with acute renal colic and a ureteral stone on NECT showing either a distal ureteral stone, a phlebolith or both. A 2.5-dimensional CNN (2.5D-CNN) model was used, where perpendicular axial, coronal and sagittal images through each calcification were used as input data for the CNN. The CNN was trained on 384 calcifications, and evaluated on an unseen dataset of 50 stones and 50 phleboliths. The CNN was compared to the assessment by seven radiologists who reviewed a local 5 × 5 × 5 cm image stack surrounding each calcification, and to a semi-quantitative method using cut-off values based on the attenuation and volume of the calcifications. The CNN differentiated stones and phleboliths with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 94%, 90% and 92% and an AUC of 0.95. This was similar to a majority vote accuracy of 93% and significantly higher (p = 0.03) than the mean radiologist accuracy of 86%. The semi-quantitative method accuracy was 49%. In conclusion, the CNN differentiated ureteral stones from phleboliths with higher accuracy than the mean of seven radiologists’ assessments using local features. However, more than local features are needed to reach optimal discrimination. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7867560/ /pubmed/32107579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01180-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jendeberg, Johan
Thunberg, Per
Lidén, Mats
Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title_full Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title_fullStr Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title_short Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
title_sort differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01180-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jendebergjohan differentiationofdistalureteralstonesandpelvicphlebolithsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT thunbergper differentiationofdistalureteralstonesandpelvicphlebolithsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT lidenmats differentiationofdistalureteralstonesandpelvicphlebolithsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork