Cargando…

In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics

Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed, Shamaa, Marwa Sameh, El-Bialy, Ahmed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575014
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.042
_version_ 1783648325226987520
author Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed
Shamaa, Marwa Sameh
El-Bialy, Ahmed A.
author_facet Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed
Shamaa, Marwa Sameh
El-Bialy, Ahmed A.
author_sort Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated from three different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: VITABLOCS Mark II, VITAENAMIC, and IPS e.max CAD. Each ceramic material group was divided into two etching groups: one treated with 9.5% HFA and the other treated with 37%. Sixty metal and CBs of the upper right central incisor were bonded to the HFA-treated blocks. Another 60 metal and CBs were bonded to the PA treated blocks. All the bonded specimens were thermocycled before shear bond strength (SBS) testing. Then the bond failure mode was recorded Results. There were no significant differences in SBS values between the three CAD/CAM ceramic materials. The HFA-treated specimens exhibited significantly higher SBS values than the PA-treated specimens. Also, the SBS values of CBs were significantly higher than the metal brackets (MBs). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was 4 for most of the groups, indicating that almost no adhesive remained on the porcelain surface. Conclusion. The CAD/CAM ceramic type did not influence SBS; however, HFA exhibited significantly higher SBS compared to PA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78676832021-02-10 In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed Shamaa, Marwa Sameh El-Bialy, Ahmed A. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated from three different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: VITABLOCS Mark II, VITAENAMIC, and IPS e.max CAD. Each ceramic material group was divided into two etching groups: one treated with 9.5% HFA and the other treated with 37%. Sixty metal and CBs of the upper right central incisor were bonded to the HFA-treated blocks. Another 60 metal and CBs were bonded to the PA treated blocks. All the bonded specimens were thermocycled before shear bond strength (SBS) testing. Then the bond failure mode was recorded Results. There were no significant differences in SBS values between the three CAD/CAM ceramic materials. The HFA-treated specimens exhibited significantly higher SBS values than the PA-treated specimens. Also, the SBS values of CBs were significantly higher than the metal brackets (MBs). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was 4 for most of the groups, indicating that almost no adhesive remained on the porcelain surface. Conclusion. The CAD/CAM ceramic type did not influence SBS; however, HFA exhibited significantly higher SBS compared to PA. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2020 2020-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7867683/ /pubmed/33575014 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.042 Text en ©2020 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghozy, Eglal Ahmed
Shamaa, Marwa Sameh
El-Bialy, Ahmed A.
In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_full In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_fullStr In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_full_unstemmed In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_short In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_sort in vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel cad/cam ceramics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575014
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.042
work_keys_str_mv AT ghozyeglalahmed invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics
AT shamaamarwasameh invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics
AT elbialyahmeda invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics