Cargando…

Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background. This study was conducted to investigate root canal overfilling with different material placement techniques in primary teeth. Methods. A systematic search was undertaken by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus for English language peer-reviewed articles published until February 2018 that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aminabadi, Naser Asl, Asl Aminabadi, Nahid, Jamali, Zahra, Shirazi, Sajjad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575016
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.043
_version_ 1783648325683118080
author Aminabadi, Naser Asl
Asl Aminabadi, Nahid
Jamali, Zahra
Shirazi, Sajjad
author_facet Aminabadi, Naser Asl
Asl Aminabadi, Nahid
Jamali, Zahra
Shirazi, Sajjad
author_sort Aminabadi, Naser Asl
collection PubMed
description Background. This study was conducted to investigate root canal overfilling with different material placement techniques in primary teeth. Methods. A systematic search was undertaken by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus for English language peer-reviewed articles published until February 2018 that reported primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling. Two reviewers independently screened and identified studies in terms of the selection criteria and independently collected the data using a specially designed data extraction form. The overfilling rate was the primary summary measure. The weighted pooled overfilling rates were estimated by random-effects meta-analysis. Results. Twenty clinical and four in vitro studies met the eligibility criteria. In the clinical studies, the pooled overfilling rate for zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) was 23.3% with a lentulo spiral mounted on a handpiece, 22.7% with a hand-held lentulo spiral, and 17% with a plugger. The pooled overfilling rate for calcium hydroxide-based materials was 16.7% with a lentulo spiral mounted on a handpiece, 14.7% with a hand-held lentulo spiral, 19.6% with a syringe, and 25.7% with a plugger. In the in vitro studies, neither individual overfilling rates nor two-by-two comparisons were subjected to meta-analysis because of an inadequate number of studies. Conclusion. The lowest overfilling rate in the clinical studies was related to plugger and handheld lentulo spiral techniques for ZOE and calcium hydroxide-based materials, respectively
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78676852021-02-10 Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis Aminabadi, Naser Asl Asl Aminabadi, Nahid Jamali, Zahra Shirazi, Sajjad J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This study was conducted to investigate root canal overfilling with different material placement techniques in primary teeth. Methods. A systematic search was undertaken by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus for English language peer-reviewed articles published until February 2018 that reported primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling. Two reviewers independently screened and identified studies in terms of the selection criteria and independently collected the data using a specially designed data extraction form. The overfilling rate was the primary summary measure. The weighted pooled overfilling rates were estimated by random-effects meta-analysis. Results. Twenty clinical and four in vitro studies met the eligibility criteria. In the clinical studies, the pooled overfilling rate for zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) was 23.3% with a lentulo spiral mounted on a handpiece, 22.7% with a hand-held lentulo spiral, and 17% with a plugger. The pooled overfilling rate for calcium hydroxide-based materials was 16.7% with a lentulo spiral mounted on a handpiece, 14.7% with a hand-held lentulo spiral, 19.6% with a syringe, and 25.7% with a plugger. In the in vitro studies, neither individual overfilling rates nor two-by-two comparisons were subjected to meta-analysis because of an inadequate number of studies. Conclusion. The lowest overfilling rate in the clinical studies was related to plugger and handheld lentulo spiral techniques for ZOE and calcium hydroxide-based materials, respectively Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2020 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7867685/ /pubmed/33575016 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.043 Text en ©2020 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aminabadi, Naser Asl
Asl Aminabadi, Nahid
Jamali, Zahra
Shirazi, Sajjad
Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort primary tooth pulpectomy overfilling by different placement techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575016
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.043
work_keys_str_mv AT aminabadinaserasl primarytoothpulpectomyoverfillingbydifferentplacementtechniquesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aslaminabadinahid primarytoothpulpectomyoverfillingbydifferentplacementtechniquesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jamalizahra primarytoothpulpectomyoverfillingbydifferentplacementtechniquesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shirazisajjad primarytoothpulpectomyoverfillingbydifferentplacementtechniquesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis