The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) continuously analyzes the gas exchange of patients during rest, exercise, recovery, and simultaneously records the response of the cardiopulmonary system. This study aimed to observe the characteristics of CPET in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and to explore the cutoff value of CPET variables in detecting PH. The diagnostic value of CPET was also investigated in a subgroup of patients who had an incorrect or missed diagnosis of PH by echocardiography. METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with suspected PH who were admitted to Fuwai Hospital from January 2017 to August 2018 were consecutively enrolled. The gold standard criterion for PH was defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization. General clinical materials, echocardiography, hemodynamics, and CPET data of the patients were collected and compared between groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the CPET variables that were independently associated with PH. To further validate the value of CPET for diagnosing PH, the CPET cutoff values obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used in patients who had an incorrect or missed diagnosis by echocardiography. RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in the study. Among them, patients with PH had significantly poorer CPET variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that peak work rate (WR), peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)), and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PetCO(2)) at the anaerobic threshold (AT) were independently associated with PH after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. The above three CPET variables were all negatively correlated with mPAP. The combined CPET variable including peak WR, peak VO(2) and PetCO(2) at AT had the largest area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of PH (0.890, 95% CI: 0.852–0.927, P<0.001). The cutoff value was 0.86, and the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% and 86.5%, respectively. Using this cutoff value, 83.7% of patients who were misdiagnosed and 67.9% of patients who had a missed diagnosis by echocardiography were identified. CONCLUSIONS: PH patients have decreased cardiopulmonary reserve, lower exercise tolerance, and increased ineffective ventilation. The combination of peak WR, peakVO(2), and PetCO(2) at AT had increased sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PH, and increased the specificity for identifying patients who had been misdiagnosed as PH by echocardiography.