Cargando…
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences
Predatory publishing represents a major challenge to scholarly communication. This paper maps the infiltration of journals suspected of predatory practices into the citation database Scopus and examines cross-country differences in the propensity of scholars to publish in such journals. Using the na...
Autores principales: | Macháček, Vít, Srholec, Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33583977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021
por: White, Michael
Publicado: (2022) -
Theoretical issues in medical library and information sciences’ articles published in scopus and web of science databases: A scoping review
por: Abdekhoda, Mohammadhiwa, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Predatory publishing continues
por: Watson, Roger
Publicado: (2018) -
Predatory Publishing and Turkey
por: KOÇAK, Zafer
Publicado: (2019) -
Awareness of predatory publishing
por: Panjikaran, Lloyd, et al.
Publicado: (2020)