Cargando…

A nomogram for predicting the risk of no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to screen the predictive factors of no-reflow after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to construct a nomogram model, to guide clinical treatment. METHODS: A total of 55...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Li, Cong, Hongliang, Lu, Yali, Chen, Xiaolin, Liu, Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569428
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8003
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to screen the predictive factors of no-reflow after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to construct a nomogram model, to guide clinical treatment. METHODS: A total of 551 elderly STEMI patients (age >65) underwent direct PCI were randomly classified into training group (n=386, 70%) and validation group (n=165, 30%). All patients in the two groups were divided into a no-reflow group and a normal blood flow group according to whether there was a no-reflow phenomenon. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relevant data, including demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, coronary angiography results, electrocardiogram (ECG) results, and biochemical indicators. Then, a nomogram model was constructed on the screened risk factors. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration. The nomogram was further confirmed in the internal validation group. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. RESULTS: Five remarkable risk factors were determined: preoperative TIMI blood flow, the diameter of the target lesion, collateral circulation, pulse pressure, and the number of leads for ST-segment elevation. The nomogram involving these five risk factors showed full calibration and discrimination in the training group, with an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66–0.77). It was confirmed in the validation group, and the entire cohort and the AUC were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56–0.73) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65–0.74), respectively. Whether in the training group or the verification group, the calibration curve for the probability of no-reflow phenomenon all showed considerable consistency between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. The decision curve revealed a specific role in our nomogram in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: We set up a nomogram that showed absolute accuracy for the prediction of the risk of no-reflow after primary PCI in elderly STEMI patients.