Cargando…

Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. METHODS: Literature was searched in databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Xiaojun, Liu, Zhili, Zeng, Rong, Shao, Jiang, Liu, Bao, Zheng, Yuehong, Liu, Changwei, Ye, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569464
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8156
_version_ 1783648366045954048
author Song, Xiaojun
Liu, Zhili
Zeng, Rong
Shao, Jiang
Liu, Bao
Zheng, Yuehong
Liu, Changwei
Ye, Wei
author_facet Song, Xiaojun
Liu, Zhili
Zeng, Rong
Shao, Jiang
Liu, Bao
Zheng, Yuehong
Liu, Changwei
Ye, Wei
author_sort Song, Xiaojun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. METHODS: Literature was searched in databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (PubMed). Eligible studies were included, and data were collected independently by 2 reviewers. We conducted a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of VTE in cancer patients. The odds ratios (ORs) of different DOACs compared with LMWHs for VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) recurrence, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), were calculated in meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 18 articles were eligible for analyses, including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 retrospective studies. Both RCTs and retrospective studies confirmed that DOACs decreased the risk of VTE recurrence [RCTs: OR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.80; retrospective studies: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.90] and DVT recurrence (RCTs: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36–0.80; retrospective studies: OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.63), but not PE recurrence or fatal PE in cancer patients. Subgroup analyses revealed an important role of rivaroxaban in decreasing recurrent VTE. Meanwhile, major bleeding events were not increased in the DOAC group, but the risks of CRNMBs were significantly elevated. Subgroup analyses confirmed the role of rivaroxaban in increasing the risk of major bleeding events and CRNMBs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LMWHs, DOACs (especially rivaroxaban) significantly reduce the risk of VTE and DVT, but not PE recurrence, in patients with cancer. Although DOACs did not increase the major bleeding events in pooled analysis, rivaroxaban showed an elevated risk of this adverse effect in subgroup analysis. In addition, the risk of CRNMB events was increased after the application of DOACs including rivaroxaban.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7867886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78678862021-02-09 Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Song, Xiaojun Liu, Zhili Zeng, Rong Shao, Jiang Liu, Bao Zheng, Yuehong Liu, Changwei Ye, Wei Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. METHODS: Literature was searched in databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (PubMed). Eligible studies were included, and data were collected independently by 2 reviewers. We conducted a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of VTE in cancer patients. The odds ratios (ORs) of different DOACs compared with LMWHs for VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) recurrence, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), were calculated in meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 18 articles were eligible for analyses, including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 retrospective studies. Both RCTs and retrospective studies confirmed that DOACs decreased the risk of VTE recurrence [RCTs: OR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.80; retrospective studies: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.90] and DVT recurrence (RCTs: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36–0.80; retrospective studies: OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.63), but not PE recurrence or fatal PE in cancer patients. Subgroup analyses revealed an important role of rivaroxaban in decreasing recurrent VTE. Meanwhile, major bleeding events were not increased in the DOAC group, but the risks of CRNMBs were significantly elevated. Subgroup analyses confirmed the role of rivaroxaban in increasing the risk of major bleeding events and CRNMBs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LMWHs, DOACs (especially rivaroxaban) significantly reduce the risk of VTE and DVT, but not PE recurrence, in patients with cancer. Although DOACs did not increase the major bleeding events in pooled analysis, rivaroxaban showed an elevated risk of this adverse effect in subgroup analysis. In addition, the risk of CRNMB events was increased after the application of DOACs including rivaroxaban. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7867886/ /pubmed/33569464 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8156 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Xiaojun
Liu, Zhili
Zeng, Rong
Shao, Jiang
Liu, Bao
Zheng, Yuehong
Liu, Changwei
Ye, Wei
Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title_full Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title_fullStr Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title_short Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
title_sort treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (doacs)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7867886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569464
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8156
work_keys_str_mv AT songxiaojun treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT liuzhili treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT zengrong treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT shaojiang treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT liubao treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT zhengyuehong treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT liuchangwei treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs
AT yewei treatmentofvenousthromboembolismincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofdifferentdirectoralanticoagulantsdoacs