Distinctive genomic characteristics in POLE/POLD1-mutant cancers can potentially predict beneficial clinical outcomes in patients who receive immune checkpoint inhibitor

BACKGROUND: Mutations in POLE /POLD1 proofreading domain can cause deficiencies in DNA repair, conferring ultramutated cancer phenotypes. Preliminary clinical studies have revealed an association between POLE/POLD1 mutations and beneficial clinical outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy This study aims to investigate the genomic characteristics of POLE/POLD-mutant tumors and the prognostic value of POLE/POLD mutation for ICI treatment. METHODS: Genomic data of 21,074 patients with 23 cancer types were retrieved from Burning Rock variant database (BR VarDB). The prevalence and spectra of POLE and POLD1 mutations were assessed and compared with that in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) samples. The correlations of POLE/POLD1 mutation with tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were investigated. The prognostic value of POLE/POLD1 mutations was also explored in 2,487 ICI-treated patients from published studies. RESULTS: BR VarDB samples displayed a similar mutational prevalence of POLE (3.2% vs. 3.2%) and POLD1 (1.4% vs. 1.6%, P=0.248) versusTCGA samples, but a slightly lower frequency of POLE and POLD1 co-mutations (0.21% vs. 0.43%, P<0.001). POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors harbored increased TCT→TAT and TCG→TTG transversions, and genomic signatures associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and ultra-hypermuation. Furthermore, tumors with POLE/POLD1 proofreading mutation showed a significantly higher TMB than tumors with non-proofreading mutations (P<0.01), although both possessed a higher TMB than POLE/POLD1 wild-type (WT) tumors (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). MSI was commonly observed in tumors harboring dominant clone of POLE/POLD1 mutation (10.2%), but occurred rarely in POLE/POLD1 WT tumors (0.5%) and tumors with accumulating sub-cloned POLE/POLD1 mutation (0%). Survival analysis revealed that POLE/POLD1 mutation was not independently correlated with longer survival after adjusting for TMB and other factors (HR =0.86, P=0.372). However, patients harboring POLE/POLD1 mutation demonstrated a higher response rate than patients with POLE/ POLD1 WT tumors (35.2% vs. 19.6%, P=0.0165). CONCLUSIONS: We delineated distinctive genomic characteristics in POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors, suggesting the potential predictive role of POLE/POLD1 mutations, especially those in the proofreading domain, for beneficial outcomes of immunotherapy. Our results also suggest that MSI caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the MMR pathway tends to result from POLE/POLD1 proofreading deficiency in POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors with MSI.