Cargando…

Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey

Fully automated vehicles (AVs) hold promise toward providing numerous societal benefits including reducing road fatalities. However, we are uncertain about how individuals’ perceptions will influence their ability to accept and adopt AVs. The 28-item Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey (AVUPS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mason, Justin, Classen, Sherrilene, Wersal, James, Sisiopiku, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626791
_version_ 1783648452316495872
author Mason, Justin
Classen, Sherrilene
Wersal, James
Sisiopiku, Virginia
author_facet Mason, Justin
Classen, Sherrilene
Wersal, James
Sisiopiku, Virginia
author_sort Mason, Justin
collection PubMed
description Fully automated vehicles (AVs) hold promise toward providing numerous societal benefits including reducing road fatalities. However, we are uncertain about how individuals’ perceptions will influence their ability to accept and adopt AVs. The 28-item Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey (AVUPS) is a visual analog scale that was previously constructed, with established face and content validity, to assess individuals’ perceptions of AVs. In this study, we examined construct validity, via exploratory factor analysis and subsequent Mokken scale analyses. Next, internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha (α) and 2-week test–retest reliability was assessed via Spearman’s rho (ρ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Mokken scale analyses resulted in a refined 20-item AVUPS and three Mokken subscales assessing specific domains of adults’ perceptions of AVs: (a) Intention to use; (b) perceived barriers; and (c) well-being. The Mokken scale analysis showed that all item-coefficients of homogeneity (H) exceeded 0.3, indicating that the items reflect a single latent variable. The AVUPS indicated a strong Mokken scale (H(scale) = 0.51) with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95) and test–retest reliability (ρ = 0.76, ICC = 0.95). Similarly, the three Mokken subscales ranged from moderate to strong (range H(scale) = 0.47–0.66) and had excellent internal consistency (range α = 0.84–0.94) and test–retest reliability (range ICC = 0.84–0.93). The AVUPS and three Mokken subscales of AV acceptance were validated in a moderate sample size (N = 312) of adults living in the United States. Two-week test–retest reliability was established using a subset of Amazon Mechanical Turk participants (N = 84). The AVUPS, or any combination of the three subscales, can be used to validly and reliably assess adults’ perceptions before and after being exposed to AVs. The AVUPS can be used to quantify adults’ acceptance of fully AVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7868437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78684372021-02-09 Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey Mason, Justin Classen, Sherrilene Wersal, James Sisiopiku, Virginia Front Psychol Psychology Fully automated vehicles (AVs) hold promise toward providing numerous societal benefits including reducing road fatalities. However, we are uncertain about how individuals’ perceptions will influence their ability to accept and adopt AVs. The 28-item Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey (AVUPS) is a visual analog scale that was previously constructed, with established face and content validity, to assess individuals’ perceptions of AVs. In this study, we examined construct validity, via exploratory factor analysis and subsequent Mokken scale analyses. Next, internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha (α) and 2-week test–retest reliability was assessed via Spearman’s rho (ρ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Mokken scale analyses resulted in a refined 20-item AVUPS and three Mokken subscales assessing specific domains of adults’ perceptions of AVs: (a) Intention to use; (b) perceived barriers; and (c) well-being. The Mokken scale analysis showed that all item-coefficients of homogeneity (H) exceeded 0.3, indicating that the items reflect a single latent variable. The AVUPS indicated a strong Mokken scale (H(scale) = 0.51) with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95) and test–retest reliability (ρ = 0.76, ICC = 0.95). Similarly, the three Mokken subscales ranged from moderate to strong (range H(scale) = 0.47–0.66) and had excellent internal consistency (range α = 0.84–0.94) and test–retest reliability (range ICC = 0.84–0.93). The AVUPS and three Mokken subscales of AV acceptance were validated in a moderate sample size (N = 312) of adults living in the United States. Two-week test–retest reliability was established using a subset of Amazon Mechanical Turk participants (N = 84). The AVUPS, or any combination of the three subscales, can be used to validly and reliably assess adults’ perceptions before and after being exposed to AVs. The AVUPS can be used to quantify adults’ acceptance of fully AVs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7868437/ /pubmed/33569031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626791 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mason, Classen, Wersal and Sisiopiku. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mason, Justin
Classen, Sherrilene
Wersal, James
Sisiopiku, Virginia
Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title_full Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title_fullStr Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title_full_unstemmed Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title_short Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
title_sort construct validity and test–retest reliability of the automated vehicle user perception survey
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626791
work_keys_str_mv AT masonjustin constructvalidityandtestretestreliabilityoftheautomatedvehicleuserperceptionsurvey
AT classensherrilene constructvalidityandtestretestreliabilityoftheautomatedvehicleuserperceptionsurvey
AT wersaljames constructvalidityandtestretestreliabilityoftheautomatedvehicleuserperceptionsurvey
AT sisiopikuvirginia constructvalidityandtestretestreliabilityoftheautomatedvehicleuserperceptionsurvey