Cargando…
Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, succes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806 |
_version_ | 1783648544222085120 |
---|---|
author | Indelli, Pier Francesco Risitano, Salvatore Pipino, Gennaro Ghirardelli, Stefano Violante, Bruno |
author_facet | Indelli, Pier Francesco Risitano, Salvatore Pipino, Gennaro Ghirardelli, Stefano Violante, Bruno |
author_sort | Indelli, Pier Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, success rate and long-term survivorship of UKA have been historically lower than Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The most common causes of UKA failure leading to revision are polyethylene wear, progression of arthritis, aseptic loosening and patella-femoral symptoms due to poor patient selection in many cases. Historically, UKA revisions have presented technical challenges mainly related to managing residual bone defects and ligament insufficiency ultimately leading to knee instability: the fear of instability has often pushed surgeons to lower the threshold for an increase of the intra-articular level of constraint. Unfortunately, the use of more constrained implants requires sacrificing bone stock and has been related to higher rates of re-revision secondary to recurrence of aseptic loosening. Because of these challenges, the authors developed a surgical technique that could combine balancing the knee during revision surgery with the use of the less constrained polyethylene option. To achieve this, we started evaluating a novel device (VERASENSE, Orthosensor, FL) designed to support soft tissue balancing during primary TKA. This intraoperative sensing technology dynamically quantifies intra-articular loads during TKA trial with the goal of correcting any residual imbalance in real time. Herein we propose a novel surgical technique, which might allow use of a primary TKA design characterized by a lower level of constraint, instead of a constrained or hinged revision knee system, during UKA revision. A key aspect of this technique is the use of sensing technology during intraoperative stability testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7868951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78689512021-02-09 Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique Indelli, Pier Francesco Risitano, Salvatore Pipino, Gennaro Ghirardelli, Stefano Violante, Bruno Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, success rate and long-term survivorship of UKA have been historically lower than Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The most common causes of UKA failure leading to revision are polyethylene wear, progression of arthritis, aseptic loosening and patella-femoral symptoms due to poor patient selection in many cases. Historically, UKA revisions have presented technical challenges mainly related to managing residual bone defects and ligament insufficiency ultimately leading to knee instability: the fear of instability has often pushed surgeons to lower the threshold for an increase of the intra-articular level of constraint. Unfortunately, the use of more constrained implants requires sacrificing bone stock and has been related to higher rates of re-revision secondary to recurrence of aseptic loosening. Because of these challenges, the authors developed a surgical technique that could combine balancing the knee during revision surgery with the use of the less constrained polyethylene option. To achieve this, we started evaluating a novel device (VERASENSE, Orthosensor, FL) designed to support soft tissue balancing during primary TKA. This intraoperative sensing technology dynamically quantifies intra-articular loads during TKA trial with the goal of correcting any residual imbalance in real time. Herein we propose a novel surgical technique, which might allow use of a primary TKA design characterized by a lower level of constraint, instead of a constrained or hinged revision knee system, during UKA revision. A key aspect of this technique is the use of sensing technology during intraoperative stability testing. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7868951/ /pubmed/33569158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Review Indelli, Pier Francesco Risitano, Salvatore Pipino, Gennaro Ghirardelli, Stefano Violante, Bruno Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title | Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title_full | Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title_fullStr | Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title_short | Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique |
title_sort | sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: surgical technique |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT indellipierfrancesco sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique AT risitanosalvatore sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique AT pipinogennaro sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique AT ghirardellistefano sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique AT violantebruno sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique |