Cargando…

Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, succes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Indelli, Pier Francesco, Risitano, Salvatore, Pipino, Gennaro, Ghirardelli, Stefano, Violante, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806
_version_ 1783648544222085120
author Indelli, Pier Francesco
Risitano, Salvatore
Pipino, Gennaro
Ghirardelli, Stefano
Violante, Bruno
author_facet Indelli, Pier Francesco
Risitano, Salvatore
Pipino, Gennaro
Ghirardelli, Stefano
Violante, Bruno
author_sort Indelli, Pier Francesco
collection PubMed
description Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, success rate and long-term survivorship of UKA have been historically lower than Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The most common causes of UKA failure leading to revision are polyethylene wear, progression of arthritis, aseptic loosening and patella-femoral symptoms due to poor patient selection in many cases. Historically, UKA revisions have presented technical challenges mainly related to managing residual bone defects and ligament insufficiency ultimately leading to knee instability: the fear of instability has often pushed surgeons to lower the threshold for an increase of the intra-articular level of constraint. Unfortunately, the use of more constrained implants requires sacrificing bone stock and has been related to higher rates of re-revision secondary to recurrence of aseptic loosening. Because of these challenges, the authors developed a surgical technique that could combine balancing the knee during revision surgery with the use of the less constrained polyethylene option. To achieve this, we started evaluating a novel device (VERASENSE, Orthosensor, FL) designed to support soft tissue balancing during primary TKA. This intraoperative sensing technology dynamically quantifies intra-articular loads during TKA trial with the goal of correcting any residual imbalance in real time. Herein we propose a novel surgical technique, which might allow use of a primary TKA design characterized by a lower level of constraint, instead of a constrained or hinged revision knee system, during UKA revision. A key aspect of this technique is the use of sensing technology during intraoperative stability testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7868951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78689512021-02-09 Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique Indelli, Pier Francesco Risitano, Salvatore Pipino, Gennaro Ghirardelli, Stefano Violante, Bruno Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical option for managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis; it represents 10% of all knee arthroplasties worldwide, increasing 32.5% annually in the United States alone. Despite evolution in surgical technique and implant design, success rate and long-term survivorship of UKA have been historically lower than Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The most common causes of UKA failure leading to revision are polyethylene wear, progression of arthritis, aseptic loosening and patella-femoral symptoms due to poor patient selection in many cases. Historically, UKA revisions have presented technical challenges mainly related to managing residual bone defects and ligament insufficiency ultimately leading to knee instability: the fear of instability has often pushed surgeons to lower the threshold for an increase of the intra-articular level of constraint. Unfortunately, the use of more constrained implants requires sacrificing bone stock and has been related to higher rates of re-revision secondary to recurrence of aseptic loosening. Because of these challenges, the authors developed a surgical technique that could combine balancing the knee during revision surgery with the use of the less constrained polyethylene option. To achieve this, we started evaluating a novel device (VERASENSE, Orthosensor, FL) designed to support soft tissue balancing during primary TKA. This intraoperative sensing technology dynamically quantifies intra-articular loads during TKA trial with the goal of correcting any residual imbalance in real time. Herein we propose a novel surgical technique, which might allow use of a primary TKA design characterized by a lower level of constraint, instead of a constrained or hinged revision knee system, during UKA revision. A key aspect of this technique is the use of sensing technology during intraoperative stability testing. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7868951/ /pubmed/33569158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Review
Indelli, Pier Francesco
Risitano, Salvatore
Pipino, Gennaro
Ghirardelli, Stefano
Violante, Bruno
Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title_full Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title_fullStr Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title_full_unstemmed Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title_short Sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: Surgical technique
title_sort sensor guided unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision: surgical technique
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7868951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8806
work_keys_str_mv AT indellipierfrancesco sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique
AT risitanosalvatore sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique
AT pipinogennaro sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique
AT ghirardellistefano sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique
AT violantebruno sensorguidedunicompartmentaltototalkneearthroplastyrevisionsurgicaltechnique