Cargando…

Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akuze, Joseph, Cousens, Simon, Lawn, Joy E., Waiswa, Peter, Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich, Arnold, Fred, Croft, Trevor, Baschieri, Angela, Blencowe, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0
_version_ 1783648582807584768
author Akuze, Joseph
Cousens, Simon
Lawn, Joy E.
Waiswa, Peter
Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich
Arnold, Fred
Croft, Trevor
Baschieri, Angela
Blencowe, Hannah
author_facet Akuze, Joseph
Cousens, Simon
Lawn, Joy E.
Waiswa, Peter
Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich
Arnold, Fred
Croft, Trevor
Baschieri, Angela
Blencowe, Hannah
author_sort Akuze, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. METHODS: We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. RESULTS: DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. CONCLUSION: DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78692072021-02-08 Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review Akuze, Joseph Cousens, Simon Lawn, Joy E. Waiswa, Peter Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Arnold, Fred Croft, Trevor Baschieri, Angela Blencowe, Hannah Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. METHODS: We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. RESULTS: DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. CONCLUSION: DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria. BioMed Central 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7869207/ /pubmed/33557845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Akuze, Joseph
Cousens, Simon
Lawn, Joy E.
Waiswa, Peter
Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich
Arnold, Fred
Croft, Trevor
Baschieri, Angela
Blencowe, Hannah
Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title_full Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title_fullStr Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title_full_unstemmed Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title_short Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
title_sort four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in demographic and health surveys: historical review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0
work_keys_str_mv AT akuzejoseph fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT cousenssimon fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT lawnjoye fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT waiswapeter fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT gordeevvladimirsergeevich fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT arnoldfred fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT crofttrevor fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT baschieriangela fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview
AT blencowehannah fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview