Cargando…
Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review
BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0 |
_version_ | 1783648582807584768 |
---|---|
author | Akuze, Joseph Cousens, Simon Lawn, Joy E. Waiswa, Peter Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Arnold, Fred Croft, Trevor Baschieri, Angela Blencowe, Hannah |
author_facet | Akuze, Joseph Cousens, Simon Lawn, Joy E. Waiswa, Peter Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Arnold, Fred Croft, Trevor Baschieri, Angela Blencowe, Hannah |
author_sort | Akuze, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. METHODS: We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. RESULTS: DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. CONCLUSION: DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7869207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78692072021-02-08 Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review Akuze, Joseph Cousens, Simon Lawn, Joy E. Waiswa, Peter Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Arnold, Fred Croft, Trevor Baschieri, Angela Blencowe, Hannah Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. METHODS: We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. RESULTS: DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. CONCLUSION: DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria. BioMed Central 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7869207/ /pubmed/33557845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Akuze, Joseph Cousens, Simon Lawn, Joy E. Waiswa, Peter Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Arnold, Fred Croft, Trevor Baschieri, Angela Blencowe, Hannah Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title | Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title_full | Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title_fullStr | Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title_short | Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review |
title_sort | four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in demographic and health surveys: historical review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akuzejoseph fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT cousenssimon fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT lawnjoye fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT waiswapeter fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT gordeevvladimirsergeevich fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT arnoldfred fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT crofttrevor fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT baschieriangela fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview AT blencowehannah fourdecadesofmeasuringstillbirthsandneonataldeathsindemographicandhealthsurveyshistoricalreview |