Cargando…

Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana

BACKGROUND: Licences to operate pharmacy premises are issued by statutory regulatory bodies. The Health Institutions and Facilities Act (Act 829) and Health Professions Regulatory Bodies Act (Act 857) regulate pharmacy premises and the business of supplying restricted medicines by retail, respective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koduah, Augustina, Sekyi-Brown, Reginald, Nyoagbe, Joseph Kodjo Nsiah, Danquah, Daniel Amaning, Kretchy, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00680-7
_version_ 1783648585929195520
author Koduah, Augustina
Sekyi-Brown, Reginald
Nyoagbe, Joseph Kodjo Nsiah
Danquah, Daniel Amaning
Kretchy, Irene
author_facet Koduah, Augustina
Sekyi-Brown, Reginald
Nyoagbe, Joseph Kodjo Nsiah
Danquah, Daniel Amaning
Kretchy, Irene
author_sort Koduah, Augustina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Licences to operate pharmacy premises are issued by statutory regulatory bodies. The Health Institutions and Facilities Act (Act 829) and Health Professions Regulatory Bodies Act (Act 857) regulate pharmacy premises and the business of supplying restricted medicines by retail, respectively, and this could create a potential regulatory overlap for pharmacy practice in Ghana. We theorise that the potential overlap of regulation duties stems from how law-makers framed issues and narratives during the formulation of these Acts. OBJECTIVE: To describe the policy actors involved, framing of narratives and decision-making processes relating to pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted and data gathered through interviewing eight key informants and reviewing Hansards, reports, bills, memoranda and Acts 829 and 857. Data were analysed to map decision-making venues, processes, actors and narratives. RESULTS: The Ministry of Health drafted the bills in July 2010 with the consensus of internal stakeholders. These were interrogated by the Parliament Select Committee on Health (with legislative power) during separate periods, and decisions made in Parliament to alter propositions of pharmacy premises regulations. Parliamentarians framed pharmacies as health facilities and reassigned their regulation from the Pharmacy Council to a new agency. The Pharmacy Council and the Pharmaceutical Society of Ghana could not participate in the decision-making processes in Parliament to oppose these alterations. The laws’ contents rested with parliamentarians as they made decisions in venues restricted to others. Legislative procedure limited participation, although non-legislative actors had some level of influence on the initial content. CONCLUSION: Implementation of these laws would have implications for policy and practice and therefore understanding how the laws were framed and formulated is important for further reforms. We recommend additional research to investigate the impact of the implementation of these Acts on pharmacy practice and business in Ghana and the findings can serve as bargaining information for reforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78692252021-02-08 Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana Koduah, Augustina Sekyi-Brown, Reginald Nyoagbe, Joseph Kodjo Nsiah Danquah, Daniel Amaning Kretchy, Irene Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Licences to operate pharmacy premises are issued by statutory regulatory bodies. The Health Institutions and Facilities Act (Act 829) and Health Professions Regulatory Bodies Act (Act 857) regulate pharmacy premises and the business of supplying restricted medicines by retail, respectively, and this could create a potential regulatory overlap for pharmacy practice in Ghana. We theorise that the potential overlap of regulation duties stems from how law-makers framed issues and narratives during the formulation of these Acts. OBJECTIVE: To describe the policy actors involved, framing of narratives and decision-making processes relating to pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted and data gathered through interviewing eight key informants and reviewing Hansards, reports, bills, memoranda and Acts 829 and 857. Data were analysed to map decision-making venues, processes, actors and narratives. RESULTS: The Ministry of Health drafted the bills in July 2010 with the consensus of internal stakeholders. These were interrogated by the Parliament Select Committee on Health (with legislative power) during separate periods, and decisions made in Parliament to alter propositions of pharmacy premises regulations. Parliamentarians framed pharmacies as health facilities and reassigned their regulation from the Pharmacy Council to a new agency. The Pharmacy Council and the Pharmaceutical Society of Ghana could not participate in the decision-making processes in Parliament to oppose these alterations. The laws’ contents rested with parliamentarians as they made decisions in venues restricted to others. Legislative procedure limited participation, although non-legislative actors had some level of influence on the initial content. CONCLUSION: Implementation of these laws would have implications for policy and practice and therefore understanding how the laws were framed and formulated is important for further reforms. We recommend additional research to investigate the impact of the implementation of these Acts on pharmacy practice and business in Ghana and the findings can serve as bargaining information for reforms. BioMed Central 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7869225/ /pubmed/33557856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00680-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Koduah, Augustina
Sekyi-Brown, Reginald
Nyoagbe, Joseph Kodjo Nsiah
Danquah, Daniel Amaning
Kretchy, Irene
Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title_full Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title_fullStr Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title_short Pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from Ghana
title_sort pharmacy premises licensing policy formulation: experience from ghana
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00680-7
work_keys_str_mv AT koduahaugustina pharmacypremiseslicensingpolicyformulationexperiencefromghana
AT sekyibrownreginald pharmacypremiseslicensingpolicyformulationexperiencefromghana
AT nyoagbejosephkodjonsiah pharmacypremiseslicensingpolicyformulationexperiencefromghana
AT danquahdanielamaning pharmacypremiseslicensingpolicyformulationexperiencefromghana
AT kretchyirene pharmacypremiseslicensingpolicyformulationexperiencefromghana