Cargando…

Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy

Glioblastomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that can persist after exposure to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in these tumors is known to foster malignant cell proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as resistanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girotti, Albert W., Fahey, Jonathan M., Korytowski, Witold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564720
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.107
_version_ 1783648658567200768
author Girotti, Albert W.
Fahey, Jonathan M.
Korytowski, Witold
author_facet Girotti, Albert W.
Fahey, Jonathan M.
Korytowski, Witold
author_sort Girotti, Albert W.
collection PubMed
description Glioblastomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that can persist after exposure to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in these tumors is known to foster malignant cell proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) is a highly effective anti-glioblastoma modality, but it is also subject to NO-mediated resistance. Studies by the authors have revealed that glioblastoma U87 and U251 cells use endogenous iNOS/NO to not only resist photokilling after an ALA/light challenge, but also to promote proliferation and migration/invasion of surviving cells. Stress-upregulated iNOS/NO was found to play a major role in these negative responses to PDT-like treatment. Our studies have revealed a tight network of upstream signaling events leading to iNOS induction in photostressed cells and transition to a more aggressive phenotype. These events include activation or upregulation of pro-survival/ pro-expansion effector proteins such as NF-κB, phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase-B (Akt), p300, Survivin, and Brd4. In addition to this upstream signaling and its regulation, pharmacologic approaches for directly suppressing iNOS at its activity vs. transcriptional level are discussed. One highly effective agent in the latter category is bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor, JQ1, which was found to minimize iNOS upregulation in photostressed U87 cells. By acting similarly at the clinical level, a BET inhibitor such as JQ1 should markedly improve the efficacy of anti-glioblastoma PDT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78695872021-02-08 Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy Girotti, Albert W. Fahey, Jonathan M. Korytowski, Witold J Cancer Metastasis Treat Article Glioblastomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that can persist after exposure to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in these tumors is known to foster malignant cell proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) is a highly effective anti-glioblastoma modality, but it is also subject to NO-mediated resistance. Studies by the authors have revealed that glioblastoma U87 and U251 cells use endogenous iNOS/NO to not only resist photokilling after an ALA/light challenge, but also to promote proliferation and migration/invasion of surviving cells. Stress-upregulated iNOS/NO was found to play a major role in these negative responses to PDT-like treatment. Our studies have revealed a tight network of upstream signaling events leading to iNOS induction in photostressed cells and transition to a more aggressive phenotype. These events include activation or upregulation of pro-survival/ pro-expansion effector proteins such as NF-κB, phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase-B (Akt), p300, Survivin, and Brd4. In addition to this upstream signaling and its regulation, pharmacologic approaches for directly suppressing iNOS at its activity vs. transcriptional level are discussed. One highly effective agent in the latter category is bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor, JQ1, which was found to minimize iNOS upregulation in photostressed U87 cells. By acting similarly at the clinical level, a BET inhibitor such as JQ1 should markedly improve the efficacy of anti-glioblastoma PDT. 2020-12-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7869587/ /pubmed/33564720 http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.107 Text en This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Girotti, Albert W.
Fahey, Jonathan M.
Korytowski, Witold
Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title_full Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title_fullStr Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title_full_unstemmed Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title_short Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
title_sort negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564720
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.107
work_keys_str_mv AT girottialbertw negativeeffectsoftumorcellnitricoxideonantiglioblastomaphotodynamictherapy
AT faheyjonathanm negativeeffectsoftumorcellnitricoxideonantiglioblastomaphotodynamictherapy
AT korytowskiwitold negativeeffectsoftumorcellnitricoxideonantiglioblastomaphotodynamictherapy