Cargando…

Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences

The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Barbara, Steenbruggen, Irene, Graham, Brian L., Coleman, Courtney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020
_version_ 1783648659056885760
author Johnson, Barbara
Steenbruggen, Irene
Graham, Brian L.
Coleman, Courtney
author_facet Johnson, Barbara
Steenbruggen, Irene
Graham, Brian L.
Coleman, Courtney
author_sort Johnson, Barbara
collection PubMed
description The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force with patient experiences, the European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with the task force, conducted an online survey in 10 languages between August and September 2018. There were 1760 respondents from 52 countries. The majority were adults (97.1%); the most common reasons for spirometry referral were diagnosis (35.0%) and management of an ongoing condition (60.1%). 53.2% reported regularly using inhalers. Respondents were very experienced with spirometry: 89.9% completed more than one test; 48% completed 10 or more tests. However, most reported not knowing what forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) means (59.4%) and only 39.6% knew their most recent FEV(1); the exception was respondents with cystic fibrosis who reported much greater knowledge. Respondents rated as moderately or seriously problematic: being told to keep blowing when they felt nothing is coming out (31.4%), coughing (30.4%), tiredness (26.3%) and concern about shortness of breath (20.1%). Overall, respondents found spirometry to be acceptable; however, an important minority (17%) found it difficult. Patients want clear information before, during and after the test, including information on stopping medications. Operators have an important role in increasing the ease of patients and changes to the testing environment can increase patient comfort. Patients want access to their results and want to understand how they relate to their individual health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78695902021-02-11 Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences Johnson, Barbara Steenbruggen, Irene Graham, Brian L. Coleman, Courtney ERJ Open Res Original Articles The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force with patient experiences, the European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with the task force, conducted an online survey in 10 languages between August and September 2018. There were 1760 respondents from 52 countries. The majority were adults (97.1%); the most common reasons for spirometry referral were diagnosis (35.0%) and management of an ongoing condition (60.1%). 53.2% reported regularly using inhalers. Respondents were very experienced with spirometry: 89.9% completed more than one test; 48% completed 10 or more tests. However, most reported not knowing what forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) means (59.4%) and only 39.6% knew their most recent FEV(1); the exception was respondents with cystic fibrosis who reported much greater knowledge. Respondents rated as moderately or seriously problematic: being told to keep blowing when they felt nothing is coming out (31.4%), coughing (30.4%), tiredness (26.3%) and concern about shortness of breath (20.1%). Overall, respondents found spirometry to be acceptable; however, an important minority (17%) found it difficult. Patients want clear information before, during and after the test, including information on stopping medications. Operators have an important role in increasing the ease of patients and changes to the testing environment can increase patient comfort. Patients want access to their results and want to understand how they relate to their individual health. European Respiratory Society 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7869590/ /pubmed/33585650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Johnson, Barbara
Steenbruggen, Irene
Graham, Brian L.
Coleman, Courtney
Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title_full Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title_fullStr Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title_full_unstemmed Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title_short Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
title_sort improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonbarbara improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences
AT steenbruggenirene improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences
AT grahambrianl improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences
AT colemancourtney improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences