Cargando…
Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020 |
_version_ | 1783648659056885760 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Barbara Steenbruggen, Irene Graham, Brian L. Coleman, Courtney |
author_facet | Johnson, Barbara Steenbruggen, Irene Graham, Brian L. Coleman, Courtney |
author_sort | Johnson, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force with patient experiences, the European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with the task force, conducted an online survey in 10 languages between August and September 2018. There were 1760 respondents from 52 countries. The majority were adults (97.1%); the most common reasons for spirometry referral were diagnosis (35.0%) and management of an ongoing condition (60.1%). 53.2% reported regularly using inhalers. Respondents were very experienced with spirometry: 89.9% completed more than one test; 48% completed 10 or more tests. However, most reported not knowing what forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) means (59.4%) and only 39.6% knew their most recent FEV(1); the exception was respondents with cystic fibrosis who reported much greater knowledge. Respondents rated as moderately or seriously problematic: being told to keep blowing when they felt nothing is coming out (31.4%), coughing (30.4%), tiredness (26.3%) and concern about shortness of breath (20.1%). Overall, respondents found spirometry to be acceptable; however, an important minority (17%) found it difficult. Patients want clear information before, during and after the test, including information on stopping medications. Operators have an important role in increasing the ease of patients and changes to the testing environment can increase patient comfort. Patients want access to their results and want to understand how they relate to their individual health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7869590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78695902021-02-11 Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences Johnson, Barbara Steenbruggen, Irene Graham, Brian L. Coleman, Courtney ERJ Open Res Original Articles The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience. To inform the task force with patient experiences, the European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with the task force, conducted an online survey in 10 languages between August and September 2018. There were 1760 respondents from 52 countries. The majority were adults (97.1%); the most common reasons for spirometry referral were diagnosis (35.0%) and management of an ongoing condition (60.1%). 53.2% reported regularly using inhalers. Respondents were very experienced with spirometry: 89.9% completed more than one test; 48% completed 10 or more tests. However, most reported not knowing what forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) means (59.4%) and only 39.6% knew their most recent FEV(1); the exception was respondents with cystic fibrosis who reported much greater knowledge. Respondents rated as moderately or seriously problematic: being told to keep blowing when they felt nothing is coming out (31.4%), coughing (30.4%), tiredness (26.3%) and concern about shortness of breath (20.1%). Overall, respondents found spirometry to be acceptable; however, an important minority (17%) found it difficult. Patients want clear information before, during and after the test, including information on stopping medications. Operators have an important role in increasing the ease of patients and changes to the testing environment can increase patient comfort. Patients want access to their results and want to understand how they relate to their individual health. European Respiratory Society 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7869590/ /pubmed/33585650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Johnson, Barbara Steenbruggen, Irene Graham, Brian L. Coleman, Courtney Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title | Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title_full | Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title_fullStr | Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title_short | Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
title_sort | improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00712-2020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonbarbara improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences AT steenbruggenirene improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences AT grahambrianl improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences AT colemancourtney improvingspirometrytestingbyunderstandingpatientpreferences |