Cargando…

Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the influence of breast density on patient's compliance during conventional handheld breast ultrasound (US) or automated breast US (ABUS), which could be used as adjunct screening modalities. METHODS: Between January 2019 and June 2019, 221 patients (mean age: 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Giorgis, Sara, Brunetti, Nicole, Zawaideh, Jeries, Rossi, Federica, Calabrese, Massimo, Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659162
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_13_20
_version_ 1783648686434156544
author De Giorgis, Sara
Brunetti, Nicole
Zawaideh, Jeries
Rossi, Federica
Calabrese, Massimo
Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
author_facet De Giorgis, Sara
Brunetti, Nicole
Zawaideh, Jeries
Rossi, Federica
Calabrese, Massimo
Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
author_sort De Giorgis, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the influence of breast density on patient's compliance during conventional handheld breast ultrasound (US) or automated breast US (ABUS), which could be used as adjunct screening modalities. METHODS: Between January 2019 and June 2019, 221 patients (mean age: 53; age range: 24–89 years) underwent both US and ABUS. All participants had independently interpreted US and ABUS regarding patient compliance. The diagnostic experience with US or ABUS was described with a modified testing morbidity index (TMI). The scale ranged from 0 (worst possible experience) to 5 (acceptable experience). Standard statistics was used to compare the data of US and data of ABUS. Breast density was recorded with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score. RESULTS: The mean TMI score was 4.6 ± 0.5 for US and 4.3 ± 0.8 for ABUS. The overall difference between patients' experience on US and ABUS was statistically significant with P < 0.0001. The difference between patients' experience on US and ABUS in women with BI-RADS C and D for breast density was statistically significant with P < 0.02 in favor of US (4.7 ± 0.4) versus 4.5 ± 0.6 for ABUS. Patients' experience with breast density B was better for US (4.7 ± 0.4) versus 4.3 ± 0.6 for ABUS with P < 0.01. Pain or discomfort occurred during testing, especially in patients >40 years. CONCLUSION: Patient age (>40 years) is a significant predictor of decreased compliance to ABUS. Compliance of ABUS resulted lower that of US independently for breast density.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78697372021-03-02 Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound De Giorgis, Sara Brunetti, Nicole Zawaideh, Jeries Rossi, Federica Calabrese, Massimo Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano J Med Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the influence of breast density on patient's compliance during conventional handheld breast ultrasound (US) or automated breast US (ABUS), which could be used as adjunct screening modalities. METHODS: Between January 2019 and June 2019, 221 patients (mean age: 53; age range: 24–89 years) underwent both US and ABUS. All participants had independently interpreted US and ABUS regarding patient compliance. The diagnostic experience with US or ABUS was described with a modified testing morbidity index (TMI). The scale ranged from 0 (worst possible experience) to 5 (acceptable experience). Standard statistics was used to compare the data of US and data of ABUS. Breast density was recorded with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score. RESULTS: The mean TMI score was 4.6 ± 0.5 for US and 4.3 ± 0.8 for ABUS. The overall difference between patients' experience on US and ABUS was statistically significant with P < 0.0001. The difference between patients' experience on US and ABUS in women with BI-RADS C and D for breast density was statistically significant with P < 0.02 in favor of US (4.7 ± 0.4) versus 4.5 ± 0.6 for ABUS. Patients' experience with breast density B was better for US (4.7 ± 0.4) versus 4.3 ± 0.6 for ABUS with P < 0.01. Pain or discomfort occurred during testing, especially in patients >40 years. CONCLUSION: Patient age (>40 years) is a significant predictor of decreased compliance to ABUS. Compliance of ABUS resulted lower that of US independently for breast density. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7869737/ /pubmed/33659162 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_13_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Medical Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
De Giorgis, Sara
Brunetti, Nicole
Zawaideh, Jeries
Rossi, Federica
Calabrese, Massimo
Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title_full Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title_fullStr Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title_short Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
title_sort influence of breast density on patient's compliance during ultrasound examination: conventional handheld breast ultrasound compared to automated breast ultrasound
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659162
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_13_20
work_keys_str_mv AT degiorgissara influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound
AT brunettinicole influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound
AT zawaidehjeries influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound
AT rossifederica influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound
AT calabresemassimo influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound
AT tagliaficoalbertostefano influenceofbreastdensityonpatientscomplianceduringultrasoundexaminationconventionalhandheldbreastultrasoundcomparedtoautomatedbreastultrasound