Cargando…
Erratum: Triple Therapy versus Dual or Monotherapy with Long-Acting Bronchodilators for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.v18erratum3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Long-acting Inhaled Bronchodilator and Risk of Vascular Events in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Taiwan Population: Erratum
Publicado: (2016) -
Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual- versus monotherapy
por: Singh, Dave, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Changing patterns in long-acting bronchodilator trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
por: Donohue, James F, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
por: Strange, Charlie, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increases the risk of pneumonias compared to the dual-bronchodilator therapy
por: Watanabe, Keisuke, et al.
Publicado: (2021)