Cargando…

A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies

PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ning, Yilin, Ho, Peh Joo, Støer, Nathalie C, Lim, Ka Keat, Wee, Hwee-Lin, Hartman, Mikael, Reilly, Marie, Tan, Chuen Seng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801
_version_ 1783648701242146816
author Ning, Yilin
Ho, Peh Joo
Støer, Nathalie C
Lim, Ka Keat
Wee, Hwee-Lin
Hartman, Mikael
Reilly, Marie
Tan, Chuen Seng
author_facet Ning, Yilin
Ho, Peh Joo
Støer, Nathalie C
Lim, Ka Keat
Wee, Hwee-Lin
Hartman, Mikael
Reilly, Marie
Tan, Chuen Seng
author_sort Ning, Yilin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous variable, but the analysis offers no assessment for the validity of the assumption. We propose an approach that assesses the proxy assumption and estimates the exposure effect by using the cumulative link model (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CLM is a well-established regression model that assumes an ordinal score is an ordered category generated from applying thresholds to a latent continuous variable. Our approach assesses the proxy assumption by testing whether these thresholds are equidistant. We compared the performance of CLM and LRM using simulated ordinal data and illustrated their application to the effect of time since diagnosis on five subscales of fatigue among breast cancer survivors measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. RESULTS: CLM had good performance in estimating the difference in means with simulated ordinal data satisfying the proxy assumption, even when the outcome had only a few categories. When the proxy assumption was inadequate, both the CLM and LRM had biased estimates with poor coverage. The proxy assumption was appropriate for four of the five subscales in our real data application to fatigue scores, which highlighted the importance of assessing the proxy assumption to avoid reporting invalid estimates in terms of the difference in scores. CONCLUSION: The proxy assumption is critical to the interpretation of the exposure effect on the difference in mean QoL scores. CLM offers a valid test for the presence of an association, a method for assessing the proxy assumption, and when the assumption is adequate, an assessment for clinical significance using the difference in means.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7869833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78698332021-02-09 A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies Ning, Yilin Ho, Peh Joo Støer, Nathalie C Lim, Ka Keat Wee, Hwee-Lin Hartman, Mikael Reilly, Marie Tan, Chuen Seng Clin Epidemiol Methodology PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous variable, but the analysis offers no assessment for the validity of the assumption. We propose an approach that assesses the proxy assumption and estimates the exposure effect by using the cumulative link model (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CLM is a well-established regression model that assumes an ordinal score is an ordered category generated from applying thresholds to a latent continuous variable. Our approach assesses the proxy assumption by testing whether these thresholds are equidistant. We compared the performance of CLM and LRM using simulated ordinal data and illustrated their application to the effect of time since diagnosis on five subscales of fatigue among breast cancer survivors measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. RESULTS: CLM had good performance in estimating the difference in means with simulated ordinal data satisfying the proxy assumption, even when the outcome had only a few categories. When the proxy assumption was inadequate, both the CLM and LRM had biased estimates with poor coverage. The proxy assumption was appropriate for four of the five subscales in our real data application to fatigue scores, which highlighted the importance of assessing the proxy assumption to avoid reporting invalid estimates in terms of the difference in scores. CONCLUSION: The proxy assumption is critical to the interpretation of the exposure effect on the difference in mean QoL scores. CLM offers a valid test for the presence of an association, a method for assessing the proxy assumption, and when the assumption is adequate, an assessment for clinical significance using the difference in means. Dove 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7869833/ /pubmed/33568948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801 Text en © 2021 Ning et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Methodology
Ning, Yilin
Ho, Peh Joo
Støer, Nathalie C
Lim, Ka Keat
Wee, Hwee-Lin
Hartman, Mikael
Reilly, Marie
Tan, Chuen Seng
A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title_full A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title_fullStr A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title_full_unstemmed A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title_short A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
title_sort new procedure to assess when estimates from the cumulative link model can be interpreted as differences for ordinal scales in quality of life studies
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801
work_keys_str_mv AT ningyilin anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT hopehjoo anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT støernathaliec anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT limkakeat anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT weehweelin anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT hartmanmikael anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT reillymarie anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT tanchuenseng anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT ningyilin newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT hopehjoo newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT støernathaliec newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT limkakeat newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT weehweelin newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT hartmanmikael newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT reillymarie newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies
AT tanchuenseng newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies