Cargando…
A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies
PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous varia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801 |
_version_ | 1783648701242146816 |
---|---|
author | Ning, Yilin Ho, Peh Joo Støer, Nathalie C Lim, Ka Keat Wee, Hwee-Lin Hartman, Mikael Reilly, Marie Tan, Chuen Seng |
author_facet | Ning, Yilin Ho, Peh Joo Støer, Nathalie C Lim, Ka Keat Wee, Hwee-Lin Hartman, Mikael Reilly, Marie Tan, Chuen Seng |
author_sort | Ning, Yilin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous variable, but the analysis offers no assessment for the validity of the assumption. We propose an approach that assesses the proxy assumption and estimates the exposure effect by using the cumulative link model (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CLM is a well-established regression model that assumes an ordinal score is an ordered category generated from applying thresholds to a latent continuous variable. Our approach assesses the proxy assumption by testing whether these thresholds are equidistant. We compared the performance of CLM and LRM using simulated ordinal data and illustrated their application to the effect of time since diagnosis on five subscales of fatigue among breast cancer survivors measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. RESULTS: CLM had good performance in estimating the difference in means with simulated ordinal data satisfying the proxy assumption, even when the outcome had only a few categories. When the proxy assumption was inadequate, both the CLM and LRM had biased estimates with poor coverage. The proxy assumption was appropriate for four of the five subscales in our real data application to fatigue scores, which highlighted the importance of assessing the proxy assumption to avoid reporting invalid estimates in terms of the difference in scores. CONCLUSION: The proxy assumption is critical to the interpretation of the exposure effect on the difference in mean QoL scores. CLM offers a valid test for the presence of an association, a method for assessing the proxy assumption, and when the assumption is adequate, an assessment for clinical significance using the difference in means. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7869833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78698332021-02-09 A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies Ning, Yilin Ho, Peh Joo Støer, Nathalie C Lim, Ka Keat Wee, Hwee-Lin Hartman, Mikael Reilly, Marie Tan, Chuen Seng Clin Epidemiol Methodology PURPOSE: Assessing the clinical importance of an exposure effect on a quality of life (QoL) score often requires quantifying the effect in terms of a difference in scores. Using the linear regression model (LRM) for this purpose assumes the ordinal score is a proxy for an underlying continuous variable, but the analysis offers no assessment for the validity of the assumption. We propose an approach that assesses the proxy assumption and estimates the exposure effect by using the cumulative link model (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CLM is a well-established regression model that assumes an ordinal score is an ordered category generated from applying thresholds to a latent continuous variable. Our approach assesses the proxy assumption by testing whether these thresholds are equidistant. We compared the performance of CLM and LRM using simulated ordinal data and illustrated their application to the effect of time since diagnosis on five subscales of fatigue among breast cancer survivors measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. RESULTS: CLM had good performance in estimating the difference in means with simulated ordinal data satisfying the proxy assumption, even when the outcome had only a few categories. When the proxy assumption was inadequate, both the CLM and LRM had biased estimates with poor coverage. The proxy assumption was appropriate for four of the five subscales in our real data application to fatigue scores, which highlighted the importance of assessing the proxy assumption to avoid reporting invalid estimates in terms of the difference in scores. CONCLUSION: The proxy assumption is critical to the interpretation of the exposure effect on the difference in mean QoL scores. CLM offers a valid test for the presence of an association, a method for assessing the proxy assumption, and when the assumption is adequate, an assessment for clinical significance using the difference in means. Dove 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7869833/ /pubmed/33568948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801 Text en © 2021 Ning et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Methodology Ning, Yilin Ho, Peh Joo Støer, Nathalie C Lim, Ka Keat Wee, Hwee-Lin Hartman, Mikael Reilly, Marie Tan, Chuen Seng A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title | A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title_full | A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title_fullStr | A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title_short | A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies |
title_sort | new procedure to assess when estimates from the cumulative link model can be interpreted as differences for ordinal scales in quality of life studies |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S288801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ningyilin anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT hopehjoo anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT støernathaliec anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT limkakeat anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT weehweelin anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT hartmanmikael anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT reillymarie anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT tanchuenseng anewproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT ningyilin newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT hopehjoo newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT støernathaliec newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT limkakeat newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT weehweelin newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT hartmanmikael newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT reillymarie newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies AT tanchuenseng newproceduretoassesswhenestimatesfromthecumulativelinkmodelcanbeinterpretedasdifferencesforordinalscalesinqualityoflifestudies |