Cargando…
Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer
The tumour microenvironment is an important factor for colorectal cancer prognosis, affecting the patient's immune response. Immune checkpoints, which regulate the immune functions of lymphocytes, may provide prognostic power. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the immune c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.193 |
_version_ | 1783648713609052160 |
---|---|
author | Al‐Badran, Sara SF Grant, Lauren Campo, Maejoy V Inthagard, Jitwadee Pennel, Kathryn Quinn, Jean Konanahalli, Prakash Hayman, Liam Horgan, Paul G McMillan, Donald C Roxburgh, Campbell SD Roseweir, Antonia Park, James H Edwards, Joanne |
author_facet | Al‐Badran, Sara SF Grant, Lauren Campo, Maejoy V Inthagard, Jitwadee Pennel, Kathryn Quinn, Jean Konanahalli, Prakash Hayman, Liam Horgan, Paul G McMillan, Donald C Roxburgh, Campbell SD Roseweir, Antonia Park, James H Edwards, Joanne |
author_sort | Al‐Badran, Sara SF |
collection | PubMed |
description | The tumour microenvironment is an important factor for colorectal cancer prognosis, affecting the patient's immune response. Immune checkpoints, which regulate the immune functions of lymphocytes, may provide prognostic power. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the immune checkpoints TIM‐3, LAG‐3 and PD‐1 in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry was employed to detect TIM‐3, LAG‐3, PD‐1 and PD‐L1 in 773 patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer. Immune checkpoint protein expression was assessed in tumour cells using the weighted histoscore, and in immune cells within the stroma using point counting. Scores were analysed for associations with survival and clinical factors. High tumoural LAG‐3 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–2.09, p = 0.049) and PD‐1 (HR 1.34 95% CI 1.00–1.78, p = 0.047) associated with poor survival, whereas high TIM‐3 (HR 0.60 95% CI 0.42–0.84, p = 0.003), LAG‐3 (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.40–0.87, p = 0.006) and PD‐1 (HR 0.65 95% CI 0.49–0.86, p = 0.002) on immune cells within the stroma associated with improved survival, while PD‐L1 in the tumour (p = 0.487) or the immune cells within the stroma (p = 0.298) was not associated with survival. Furthermore, immune cell LAG‐3 was independently associated with survival (p = 0.017). Checkpoint expression scores on stromal immune cells were combined into a Combined Immune Checkpoint Stromal Score (CICSS), where CICSS 3 denoted all high, CICSS 2 denoted any two high, and CICSS 1 denoted other combinations. CICSS 3 was associated with improved patient survival (HR 0.57 95% CI 0.42–0.78, p = 0.001). The results suggest that individual and combined high expression of TIM‐3, LAG‐3, and PD‐1 on stromal immune cells are associated with better colorectal cancer prognosis, suggesting there is added value to investigating multiple immune checkpoints simultaneously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7869939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78699392021-02-17 Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer Al‐Badran, Sara SF Grant, Lauren Campo, Maejoy V Inthagard, Jitwadee Pennel, Kathryn Quinn, Jean Konanahalli, Prakash Hayman, Liam Horgan, Paul G McMillan, Donald C Roxburgh, Campbell SD Roseweir, Antonia Park, James H Edwards, Joanne J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles The tumour microenvironment is an important factor for colorectal cancer prognosis, affecting the patient's immune response. Immune checkpoints, which regulate the immune functions of lymphocytes, may provide prognostic power. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the immune checkpoints TIM‐3, LAG‐3 and PD‐1 in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry was employed to detect TIM‐3, LAG‐3, PD‐1 and PD‐L1 in 773 patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer. Immune checkpoint protein expression was assessed in tumour cells using the weighted histoscore, and in immune cells within the stroma using point counting. Scores were analysed for associations with survival and clinical factors. High tumoural LAG‐3 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–2.09, p = 0.049) and PD‐1 (HR 1.34 95% CI 1.00–1.78, p = 0.047) associated with poor survival, whereas high TIM‐3 (HR 0.60 95% CI 0.42–0.84, p = 0.003), LAG‐3 (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.40–0.87, p = 0.006) and PD‐1 (HR 0.65 95% CI 0.49–0.86, p = 0.002) on immune cells within the stroma associated with improved survival, while PD‐L1 in the tumour (p = 0.487) or the immune cells within the stroma (p = 0.298) was not associated with survival. Furthermore, immune cell LAG‐3 was independently associated with survival (p = 0.017). Checkpoint expression scores on stromal immune cells were combined into a Combined Immune Checkpoint Stromal Score (CICSS), where CICSS 3 denoted all high, CICSS 2 denoted any two high, and CICSS 1 denoted other combinations. CICSS 3 was associated with improved patient survival (HR 0.57 95% CI 0.42–0.78, p = 0.001). The results suggest that individual and combined high expression of TIM‐3, LAG‐3, and PD‐1 on stromal immune cells are associated with better colorectal cancer prognosis, suggesting there is added value to investigating multiple immune checkpoints simultaneously. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7869939/ /pubmed/33338327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.193 Text en © 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland & John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Al‐Badran, Sara SF Grant, Lauren Campo, Maejoy V Inthagard, Jitwadee Pennel, Kathryn Quinn, Jean Konanahalli, Prakash Hayman, Liam Horgan, Paul G McMillan, Donald C Roxburgh, Campbell SD Roseweir, Antonia Park, James H Edwards, Joanne Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title | Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title_full | Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title_short | Relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
title_sort | relationship between immune checkpoint proteins, tumour microenvironment characteristics, and prognosis in primary operable colorectal cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albadransarasf relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT grantlauren relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT campomaejoyv relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT inthagardjitwadee relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT pennelkathryn relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT quinnjean relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT konanahalliprakash relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT haymanliam relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT horganpaulg relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT mcmillandonaldc relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT roxburghcampbellsd relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT roseweirantonia relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT parkjamesh relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer AT edwardsjoanne relationshipbetweenimmunecheckpointproteinstumourmicroenvironmentcharacteristicsandprognosisinprimaryoperablecolorectalcancer |