Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of fully automated electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological test for detection of past SARS-CoV-2 infection and to be used in seroprevalence surveys. Method: A total of 426 patients who had tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 fr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575149 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12588 |
_version_ | 1783648750664679424 |
---|---|
author | Afzal, Nayab Tariq, Naila Raza, Saba Shakeel, Danish |
author_facet | Afzal, Nayab Tariq, Naila Raza, Saba Shakeel, Danish |
author_sort | Afzal, Nayab |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of fully automated electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological test for detection of past SARS-CoV-2 infection and to be used in seroprevalence surveys. Method: A total of 426 patients who had tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 from August 1 to 31, 2020 were selected for the study. Informed consent was obtained and a questionnaire including the patient’s age, gender, symptoms, and past polymerase chain reaction (PCR) status was filled by the patient. Samples were analyzed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies on Roche Cobas e601. Results: The mean age of the patients was 42.43±16.67 years. One hundred and five (24.6%) were PCR positive, while 321 (75.4%) were PCR negative. Most patients were males 241 (56.6%) while 185(43.3%) were females. Over 185(43.3%) patients presented with symptoms, and the rest of the patients 241 (56.6%) were asymptomatic. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 had sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 99.06%, positive predictive value (PPV) 96.90%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96.6%, and positive likelihood ratio 4.26, while negative likelihood ratio 0.1. Diagnostic accuracy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 96.7% based on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 is very useful for the detection of past COVID-19 infection; it can be proved helpful in the identification of post-COVID complications and actual disease burden in a population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7870122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78701222021-02-10 Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test Afzal, Nayab Tariq, Naila Raza, Saba Shakeel, Danish Cureus Allergy/Immunology Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of fully automated electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological test for detection of past SARS-CoV-2 infection and to be used in seroprevalence surveys. Method: A total of 426 patients who had tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 from August 1 to 31, 2020 were selected for the study. Informed consent was obtained and a questionnaire including the patient’s age, gender, symptoms, and past polymerase chain reaction (PCR) status was filled by the patient. Samples were analyzed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies on Roche Cobas e601. Results: The mean age of the patients was 42.43±16.67 years. One hundred and five (24.6%) were PCR positive, while 321 (75.4%) were PCR negative. Most patients were males 241 (56.6%) while 185(43.3%) were females. Over 185(43.3%) patients presented with symptoms, and the rest of the patients 241 (56.6%) were asymptomatic. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 had sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 99.06%, positive predictive value (PPV) 96.90%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96.6%, and positive likelihood ratio 4.26, while negative likelihood ratio 0.1. Diagnostic accuracy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 96.7% based on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 is very useful for the detection of past COVID-19 infection; it can be proved helpful in the identification of post-COVID complications and actual disease burden in a population. Cureus 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7870122/ /pubmed/33575149 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12588 Text en Copyright © 2021, Afzal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Allergy/Immunology Afzal, Nayab Tariq, Naila Raza, Saba Shakeel, Danish Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serological Test |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay anti-sars-cov-2 serological test |
topic | Allergy/Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575149 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afzalnayab diagnosticaccuracyofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayantisarscov2serologicaltest AT tariqnaila diagnosticaccuracyofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayantisarscov2serologicaltest AT razasaba diagnosticaccuracyofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayantisarscov2serologicaltest AT shakeeldanish diagnosticaccuracyofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayantisarscov2serologicaltest |