Cargando…

A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences

Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Khan, Aziz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556000
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604
_version_ 1783648754252906496
author Khan, Aziz
author_facet Khan, Aziz
author_sort Khan, Aziz
collection PubMed
description Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the number of research articles published between 2000 and 2020 that contained non-inclusive terms with racial connotations, such as “blacklist” and “whitelist”, or “master” and “slave”. This reveals that non-inclusive language is being increasingly used in the life sciences literature, and I urge the global academic community to expunge these archaic terms to make science inclusive for everyone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78701372021-02-10 A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences Khan, Aziz eLife Feature Article Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the number of research articles published between 2000 and 2020 that contained non-inclusive terms with racial connotations, such as “blacklist” and “whitelist”, or “master” and “slave”. This reveals that non-inclusive language is being increasingly used in the life sciences literature, and I urge the global academic community to expunge these archaic terms to make science inclusive for everyone. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7870137/ /pubmed/33556000 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604 Text en © 2021, Khan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Feature Article
Khan, Aziz
A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title_full A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title_fullStr A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title_full_unstemmed A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title_short A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
title_sort call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
topic Feature Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556000
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604
work_keys_str_mv AT khanaziz acalltoeradicatenoninclusivetermsfromthelifesciences
AT khanaziz calltoeradicatenoninclusivetermsfromthelifesciences