Cargando…
A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences
Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556000 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604 |
_version_ | 1783648754252906496 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Aziz |
author_facet | Khan, Aziz |
author_sort | Khan, Aziz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the number of research articles published between 2000 and 2020 that contained non-inclusive terms with racial connotations, such as “blacklist” and “whitelist”, or “master” and “slave”. This reveals that non-inclusive language is being increasingly used in the life sciences literature, and I urge the global academic community to expunge these archaic terms to make science inclusive for everyone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7870137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78701372021-02-10 A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences Khan, Aziz eLife Feature Article Since the Black Lives Matter movement rose to mainstream prominence, the academic enterprise has started recognizing the systematic racism present in science. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make sure that the language used to communicate science is inclusive. Here, I quantify the number of research articles published between 2000 and 2020 that contained non-inclusive terms with racial connotations, such as “blacklist” and “whitelist”, or “master” and “slave”. This reveals that non-inclusive language is being increasingly used in the life sciences literature, and I urge the global academic community to expunge these archaic terms to make science inclusive for everyone. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7870137/ /pubmed/33556000 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604 Text en © 2021, Khan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Feature Article Khan, Aziz A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title | A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title_full | A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title_fullStr | A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title_full_unstemmed | A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title_short | A call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
title_sort | call to eradicate non-inclusive terms from the life sciences |
topic | Feature Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556000 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanaziz acalltoeradicatenoninclusivetermsfromthelifesciences AT khanaziz calltoeradicatenoninclusivetermsfromthelifesciences |